|
Professor Martin Marty
Historian, University of Chicago |
http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/sightings/archive_2012/0723.shtml
July 23, 2012
Episcopal Church Adapting to Culture
— Martin E. Marty
Miracles do happen. They are happening recently in
the media world on the church front. Critics are responding to recent attacks
on the Episcopal Church. Inspired by reports of the obvious, that that church
body has experienced very significant losses of membership and church
attendance in recent years, critics in national newspapers and elsewhere beyond
the confines of that denomination have gone public with accounts of what's
wrong with that body. Notable examples were Ross Douthat's "Can Liberal
Christianity Be Saved?" in the New York Times and "What Ails
Episcopalians?" by Jay Akasie in the Wall Street Journal. Most
such headlined questions on charges by writers who know the answers, are
ignored. Episcopalians, like members of all Christian bodies of which we have
heard (since the time of the letters of the Apostle Paul) have been too busy
fighting each other to pay attention to snipers from a distance. Or Episcopalians
simply yawned, changed the subject, and kept doing what they were doing.
The frequent and notable recent responses to attacks
do not deny documentations of "decline," but, with their nerves
touched, they find the ideologies behind the attacks and the assumptions of the
attackers too weighty to ignore. The attacks all come down to the charge that
in recent decades Episcopalians have adapted too strongly to "secular
liberalism." We can only signal and touch on a few examples. Thus Bishop Stacy
F. Sauls in a letter to the Times turned the attack on its head. The
Chief Operating Officer of the Church agrees, Yes, "the church has been
captive to the dominant culture, which has rewarded it . . . for a long, long
time." And now the Church is liberating itself by trying "to be a
follower of Jesus." It is now "standing by those the culture
marginalizes," and thus is counter-cultural at last. The Bishop makes
brief references to Jesus and to Paul's writing in Galatians 3:28 to support
his claim.
Sarah Morice-Brubaker charges online that Douthat
poses false alternatives for the Church: "Either Unpromising"
archaism or becoming "a Secular Den of Promiscuity and Irrelevance."
Like other respondents to attacks, she invokes Jesus and the central Christian
narrative in an attempt to show how the Church which the critic dismisses is,
on some ground, closer to the Gospel than are the critics, who are bound to
other elements in the culture. Diana Butler Bass, an upfront prolific writer on
mainline Christian trends sees 'mean-spirited or partisan" criticism. She
finds Douthat and company stuck back in 1974 with a notable book by Dean
Kelley, Why Conservative Churches Are Growing, which was astute about
life forties years ago. She asks, has he looked lately at decline in Catholicism,
Missouri Synod Lutheranism, the Southern Baptist Convention—and, she could have
added, non-growth or decline of denominations wanted to be counter-churches to
the conservatives? Face it, says Bass: today "liberal churches are not the
only ones declining." She'd prefer to see analysts facing up to that
rather than attacking the groups they don't like. For her the question is not
"Can Liberal Christianity be Saved?" but "Can Liberal Christians
Save Christianity?"
In a future Sightings, I'll take specific
note of attempts to provide an interpretive framework by two significant
historians, Jill K. Gill and David Hollinger. No more than anyone else do they
have answers to all the demographic, theological and churchly issues posed
here, but their cautions should make the public take second looks at
"decline"
and adaptations to "secular liberalism." So we have a debate? That's
miraculous!
References
Martin E. Marty's
biography, publications, and contact information can be found at www.memarty.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment