Rome-watch: Chinese government backed Church says it will ordain 40 bishops without Vatican approval

http://www.romereports.com/palio/Chinese-government-backed-Church-says-it-will-ordain-40-bishops-without-Vatican-approval-english-4455.html


July 2, 2011. (Romereports.com) Once again, the Vatican is at odds with China's government backed church. It's called the Catholic Patriotic Church, which recently ordained a bishop without Vatican approval. Father Paul Lei Shiyin, was ordained bishop of Leshan by the head of the gubernatorial Church on June 29th, the feast day of St. Peter and St. Paul.

Some say holding the ceremony on that religious date only highlights the disregard Chinese church officials have when it comes to the Vatican. Not only have warnings been ignored, but Chinese officials say they plan to ordain another 40 bishops with or without Vatican approval.

According to published reports, the newly ordained bishop, personally requested approval from the Vatican. But in an interview with UCA news agency, he said he couldn't wait any longer for an answer. He also said, “we have to consider the Church's survival....and must work according to reality.” Creating even more controversy, Shiyin is said to have had an affair and fathered a child.

About 1,000 people attended the ceremony, but it's still unclear if everyone was there voluntarily. In the past, clerics who are faithful to the Vatican, have been threatened if they refuse to attend these type of government backed ceremonies.

Ordaining bishops without Vatican approval could automatically lead to excommunication.

Why Luther Went to Rome | Here I Walk

We will be following this 70-day trek on foot by these journalists. They have ecumenism in their thinking. Yet, we will be sifting for facts and remembering Brother Martin's journey to hell and back, to Rome on foot and back to Wittenberg and Erfurt n foot.

Why Luther Went to Rome Here I Walk

Aug 21
Why Luther Went to Rome

Moti­va­tion is one of the most dif­fi­cult things to deter­mine, even for peo­ple who are alive, as any ther­a­pist will tell you. The shelves of Luther biogra­phies have accu­mu­lated more than their fair share of psy­cho­an­a­lysts. And not with­out rea­son. Luther’s fer­vent piety, the intense anx­i­ety he showed over his own sal­va­tion, the degree to which he desired—yet con­stantly failed—to achieve any peace with God, the later demo­niza­tion of his oppo­nents: all these sug­gest an extra­or­di­nar­ily rich and com­pli­cated char­ac­ter. Why was he in par­tic­u­lar so unable to tol­er­ate a the­o­log­i­cal and eccle­si­as­ti­cal sys­tem that plenty of others—even reform­ers of the past themselves—managed to work within and around?

But all this is yet to come for Luther. In 1510 his moti­va­tions were some­what sim­pler. That’s why his pil­grim­age is eas­ier to recre­ate than so many of the other bits of his his­tory, tied as they were to words and meet­ings. The land remains to a greater degree than any of the per­son­al­i­ties he inter­acted with. Luther was sent to Rome by his order. Other moti­va­tions would have been quite sec­ondary to his pri­mary obedience.

He was, of course, curi­ous about the land between Erfurt and Rome. Notes from his later con­ver­sa­tions at table show a healthy inter­est in the peo­ple, cus­toms, and flora of his jour­ney. More par­tic­u­lar was his atten­tion to tech­ni­cal and orga­ni­za­tional dif­fer­ences: a mechan­i­cal clock in Nurem­berg, the foundling house in Flo­rence. Absent seems to be any inter­est in the visual cul­ture of the Renais­sance that would have sur­rounded him in Bologna or Siena.

And he would have been moti­vated by the chance to do pious works in Rome—the most holy city of all Chris­ten­dom (with the pos­si­ble excep­tion of the difficult-to-reach, Mameluk-controlled Jerusalem). Con­trary to pop­u­lar opinion—created, in all like­li­hood, by later Ref­or­ma­tion polemics—Rome wasn’t thought holy pri­mar­ily because of the Pope. The papacy was a con­flicted insti­tu­tion in 1510; the popes of Luther’s time were respected in pub­lic but the sub­jects of scathing satire and cri­tique by many promi­nent church­men for their glar­ing shortcomings.

No, for West­ern Chris­tians, Rome was first of all the city of mar­tyrs. When Luther saw the steeples and domes in the dis­tance he reports him­self to have descended to his knees and cried, “Be greeted, most holy Rome.” Holy because it was bathed in the blood of what was believed at the time to have been hun­dreds of thou­sands of Chris­tians slain by pagan offi­cials for con­fess­ing Christ. The merit of these most holy believ­ers was acces­si­ble through count­less holy acts. Luther surely would have looked for­ward to these opportunities.

But even this was a sec­ondary pur­pose. His pri­mary reason—if not motivation—was a rather arcane errand of his order. The Erfurt house and its prior, Johann Nathin, belonged to a reform move­ment among the Augus­tini­ans that sought to expand a more strict obser­vance of the rule. The houses in Nurem­berg, Kulm­bach, and Erfurt were par­tic­u­larly fer­vent, and they objected strongly to an effec­tive merger of the reformed with the province at large announced on Sep­tem­ber 30, 1510—a union forced upon them by Luther’s later friend and influ­en­tial advi­sor John Staupitz, who was at the time head of the Saxon congregation.

Union would water down the reform­ing cause, the strict obser­vants believed. And so an alliance of the strict decided to appeal to the vicar gen­eral, Giles (Egidio) of Viterbo, in Rome. There was clearly some urgency about the appeal. It seems likely they wanted to try and get to Rome before the passes of the Alps became com­pletely… well, impassable.

Five years of study and earnest reli­gious life had brought Luther to the atten­tion of his broth­ers. A com­bi­na­tion of his demon­strated poten­tial and vig­or­ous youth made him an ideal can­di­date for what was sure to be a demand­ing jour­ney. And so in Novem­ber of 1510 he left Erfurt. He would not have trav­eled alone, for such was for­bid­den by the rule. He was likely accom­pa­nied by Anton Kresz, from the obser­vant house in Nurem­berg, who is believed to have been the one in charge of the appeal.

As to their mode of trans­port: they walked. Such was their lot as fri­ars. Horses and car­riages belonged to sol­diers and nobil­ity. Despite being among the best edu­cated and respected peo­ple of the time, walk­ing fit their vol­un­tary low­li­ness. Suf­fer­ing and humil­i­a­tion were part of the pro­gram. Pil­grim­age was penance, after all.

Walking 1,000 Miles in the Footsteps of Martin Luther, From Erfurt, Germany to Rome, and Thinking About the Reformation. - WSJ.com

Walking 1,000 Miles in the Footsteps of Martin Luther, From Erfurt, Germany to Rome, and Thinking About the Reformation. - WSJ.com

We'll be following this blog as the steps of Bruder Martin are retraced by a few journalists from Erfurt to earth's hell hole, Rome, Vatican, the home to all manner of usurpations.

The trip by these WSJ writers will take 70 days and will attempt to follow Martin's footsteps in 1510--when he went to hell on earth.

You may wish to follow the feed at www.hereiwalk.org/feed/

We will be walking alongside, electronically.

The itinerary for these "church ecumenists" is below. We would propose that Pope Benedict set out "on foot" in "sackcloth and ashes" and make his "pilgrimmages" to Erfurt and Wittenberg. End of story.

--------------

Below is our pro­posed itin­er­ary. Many of the stop­ping places are small vil­lages or even ham­lets, so I’ve included the larger towns on-route or nearby.

This sched­ule will likely change some­what before we leave, and while we adjust it on-route. Stay tuned to our progress posts for more exact esti­mate of our arrival in any given place.

If you want more spe­cific route infor­ma­tion, visit our maps page, where each day’s jour­ney is indi­cated in dis­tinct colors.

Date City
08–21 Erfurt
08–22 Arn­stadt
08–23 Paulinzella
08–24 Dees­bach
08–25 Almer­swind (~Coburg)
08–26 Grub am Forst
08–27 Lofeld (~Licht­en­fels)
08–28 Bam­berg
08–29 Bam­berg
08–30 Hallern­dorf
08–31 Dor­mitz (~Erlan­gen)
09–01 Nurm­burg
09–02 Haag (~Schwabach)
09–03 Brom­bach
09–04 Gun­zen­hausen
09–05 Oet­tin­gen in Bay­ern
09–06 Nordlin­gen
09–07 Auern­heim
09–08 Stet­ten ob Lon­tal
09–09 Ulm
09–10 Ulm
09–11 Weis­shorn (~Senden)
09–12 Boos
09–13 Rothen­stein (~Mem­min­gen)
09–14 Ermengerst (~Kempten)
09–15 Wil­hams (~Mis­sen)
09–16 Schei­degg
09–17 Bre­genz
09–18 Bre­genz
09–19 Rankweil
09–20 Maien­feld
09–21 Parpan (~Chur)
09–22 Fur­natsch (~Tiefen­cas­tel)
09–23 Casac­cio (~Sep­ti­mer Pass)
09–24 Chi­avenna
09–25 Grave­dona
09–26 Musa
09–27 Laglio
09–28 Seveso (~Como)
09–29 Milan
09–30 Pavia
10–01 Santa Cristina
10–02 Cal­en­dasco
10–03 Pia­cenza
10–04 Fioren­zuolo
10–05 Costamez­zana
10–06 ~Bar­done
10–07 Passo Cisa
10–08 Vil­lafranca in Luni­giana
10–09 Sarzana (~Spezia)
10–10 Sarzana
10–11 Massa
10–12 Camaiore
10–13 Altopas­cio (Lucca)
10–14 Flo­rence
10–15 Flo­rence, San Mini­ato
10–16 San Gimignano
10–17 San Gimignano
10–18 Mon­terig­gione
10–19 Sienna
10–20 Buon­con­vento
10–21 Cas­tiglione d’Orcia
10–22 Ponte del Rigo
10–23 San Lorenzo Nuovo
10–24 Mon­te­fi­as­cone
10–25 Viterbo
10–26 Capran­ica
10–27 Cam­pag­nano di Roma
10–28 La Storta
10–29 Rome
10–30 Rome