Reformed Churchmen

We are Confessional Calvinists and a Prayer Book Church-people. In 2012, we remembered the 350th anniversary of the 1662 Book of Common Prayer; also, we remembered the 450th anniversary of John Jewel's sober, scholarly, and Reformed "An Apology of the Church of England." In 2013, we remembered the publication of the "Heidelberg Catechism" and the influence of Reformed theologians in England, including Heinrich Bullinger's Decades. For 2014: Tyndale's NT translation. For 2015, John Roger, Rowland Taylor and Bishop John Hooper's martyrdom, burned at the stakes. Books of the month. December 2014: Alan Jacob's "Book of Common Prayer" at: http://www.amazon.com/Book-Common-Prayer-Biography-Religious/dp/0691154813/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1417814005&sr=8-1&keywords=jacobs+book+of+common+prayer. January 2015: A.F. Pollard's "Thomas Cranmer and the English Reformation: 1489-1556" at: http://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Cranmer-English-Reformation-1489-1556/dp/1592448658/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1420055574&sr=8-1&keywords=A.F.+Pollard+Cranmer. February 2015: Jaspar Ridley's "Thomas Cranmer" at: http://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Cranmer-Jasper-Ridley/dp/0198212879/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1422892154&sr=8-1&keywords=jasper+ridley+cranmer&pebp=1422892151110&peasin=198212879

Showing posts with label Gene Robinson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gene Robinson. Show all posts

Friday, July 20, 2012

David Virtue, Global Internet Rips on TEC, and the Delusional GC 2012

David Virtue, the internet, websites, and blogs continue to rip the TEC effectively.  The level of self-deception and blindness in the TEC leaders continues to stagger close observers.  Oh what 10 years has brought them, a 23% decline in attendance (2000-2010) with no let-up in sight.  It's a difficult issue for older folks.  (Never mind, there aren't many youths these days.)

http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=16326

Dear Brothers and Sisters www.virtueonline.org
July 20, 2012

The Anglican/Episcopal drama is quite possibly the most riveting story in contemporary Christianity. The power of the Internet via websites, blogs and social media including, VIRTUEONLINE
www.virtueonline.org, has brought this vividly to light, most recently at the Episcopal Church's 77th General Convention held in Indianapolis, Indiana.

Never in history has the little media guy had a chance to rise up and challenge the ecclesiastical powers and ask if the emperors (read bishops) have legitimate theological clothes. Never before has it been the place to challenge those in authority over us and to ask the hard tough questions. We at V OL won't settle for easy answers.

With the help of the Internet, Anglicans in African provinces can get the word instantly and spread the word that there is an alternative to the revisionist Episcopal Church. Although the ACNA and other Anglican bodies have their issues, that they exist at all in the strength they have–including old Episcopal congregations and dioceses, with or without the property–is a testament to the power of the Internet and our persistent voices.

At General Convention this past week in Indianapolis, I challenged the new incoming House of Deputies president, Gay Jennings who had raged on and on about how we need to get the youth back in the church and promote them. I stood up at a press conference and point blank asked her why the youth of the conservative Diocese of Dallas had not attended the last five years of national Episcopal Youth Events. They feel alienated, been publicly abused, called homophobic and other names because they are evangelicals and believe in the authority of Scripture. She almost strangled on the question and fobbed it off. Later, Bishop Leo Frade of Southeast Florida came up to me to say he was ashamed that was the case and that he would look into it.

When I asked Presiding Bishop Jefferts Schori at another press conference why the national church headquarters might have to be sold off to pay the $37.5 million mortgage owing on it for legal fees, she replied that the building was worth substantially more than that. (815 2nd Avenue costs $8.7 million annually just to maintain.) Of course she didn't reply to the deeper question as to why endless lawsuits are being fought and litigated over property that most bishops can never hope to maintain even if they win them. Is it any wonder there is a huge disconnect between what goes on in parishes and what bishops and clergy pass at General Conventions?

Can anyone imagine 99% of Episcopal parishes deliberately hiring a transgendered priest? "Hi, I'm Laura, I used to be Lauren. I had a sex change operation two years ago and the Bishop of San Diego said I was fit to be a priest, so I want to be your priest. Let me in." You can't parody this stuff. Malcolm Muggeridge once told me that when he was editor of PUNCH magazine, they had a parody edition planned on the Soviet Union's collectivization being the Kingdom of God of Earth, when up jumped Dean Hewlett Johnson and actually said it was. They killed that edition.

The real hero of this General Convention was not the adoption of a long list of resolutions including asking the U.S. Congress to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), rejecting the Covenant, voting for gay marriage, seriously reducing funding to the Anglican Communion Office, providing rites for pet funerals, the need for new structures owing to lower income into church coffers, the passage of the predictable provisional liturgies for same sex marriage or even the possibility that PA Bishop Charles E. Bennison will hire a trannie, as a priest of say, St. Clements, Philadelphia. The true face of courage came from one single bishop - Mark Lawrence of South Carolina who, in the face of the mostly revisionist House of Bishops and the 22 Communion Partner bishops stood up and said, "We here by repudiate, denounce and reject any action of The Episcopal Church which purports to bless what or Lord clearly does not bless. We declare any rite which purports to bless same-gender unions to be beyond the authority and jurisdiction of the General Convention of The Episcopal Church and without force or effect."

It was an unprecedented shot across the bows of Presiding Bishop Jefferts Schori and her cohort of sycophantic bishops who would not oppose her even if the Holy Spirit hit them over the head with a 1928 Prayer Book.

All week long, Bishop Lawrence had been a voice crying in the wilderness. He and his colleague, Bishop William Love of Albany, were the only two Episcopal bishops who put up a scrap in the House of Bishops when their brother and sister bishops debated Resolution D002 which called for the inclusion all of persons to all ministry regardless of their sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, thereby embracing transgenderedness. At one point, the newly anointed Bishop of Central Florida, Gregory O. Brewer rose to say that the passage of Rites for same sex marriage would impact Global South evangelistic efforts, perhaps even endangering lives. This had zero impact on the self-absorbed, narcissistic openly gay Bishop of New Hampshire, V. Gene Robinson who continually bewailed the endless homophobia of those who oppose his behavior.

The good bishop of South Carolina voiced his disapproval over similar Resolution D019 calling for the total inclusion of all persons regardless of the sexual orientation, gender identity or expression in the life, worship and governance of the church.

Bishop Lawrence's pleas fell on deaf ears and hardened hearts and "T" -- transgender -- was added to the list of The Episcopal Church's protected sexual deviations: LGBT.

Altogether the passage of Resolutions D002 and D016 along with the concurrence of A049, the Convention's spiritual decay became just too much for the sensibilities of the South Carolina delegation. On Tuesday night, the entire membership of the deputation, including Bishop Lawrence, walked out. He left behind just two members to say that his diocese had not left The Episcopal Church. He is now consulting with his diocese on how he will move forward.

As he has won in the courts over property issues and has offered a "quit claim" to parishes to decide their own future, would anybody really be surprised if he and the diocese upped and left TEC? Time will tell. For the moment, he says he has no intention of leaving The Episcopal Church.

Ironically, what emerged from this litany of evil resolutions has been the excoriation of TEC by the secular press of TEC's actions. That in itself is unprecedented.

Take for example what Ross Douthart wrote in the New York Times: "the leaders of the Episcopal Church and similar bodies often don't seem to be offering anything you can't already get from a purely secular liberalism, which suggests that perhaps they should pause, amid their frantic renovations, and consider not just what they would change about historic Christianity, but what they would defend and offer uncompromisingly to the world. Absent such a reconsideration, their fate is nearly certain: they will change, and change, and die."

Or consider what William Murchison of Creators Syndicate wrote: "The mistake of Christian bodies like the Methodists, the Presbyterians, the Episcopalians, and even the Roman Catholics has been to woo the culture by pretending that Truth at bottom is just personal opinion; that religious viewpoint admits prejudice more often than heavenly light."

Jay Akasie of the Wall Street Journal wrote in an article, What Ails the Episcopalians. A sub head ran, "Its numbers and coffers shrinking, the church votes for pet funerals but offers little to the traditional faithful."

He ripped her a real one when he said, "Bishop (Jefferts) Schori is known for brazenly carrying a metropolitan cross during church processions. With its double horizontal bars, the metropolitan cross is a liturgical accouterment that's typically reserved for Old World bishops. And her reign as presiding bishop has been characterized by actions more akin to a potentate than a clergywoman watching over a flock.

"In recent years she's sued breakaway, traditionalist dioceses which find the mother church increasingly radical. Church legislators have asked publicly how much the legal crusades have cost, to no avail. In the week before this summer's convention, Bishop (Jefferts) Schori sent shock waves through the church by putting forth her own national budget without consulting the convention's budget committee-consisting partly of laymen-which until now has traditionally drafted the document." He had much more to say which you can read in today's digest.

This was the final straw for the newly anointed Gay Jennings, President of the House of Deputies who rushed out a piece for the Washington Post in which she opined that Episcopal churches are really short on politics, sexuality debates and long on Jesus. Such fictional writing defies everything that this and previous General Conventions are about. 99% of all resolutions passed never mention Jesus (except to use him to support whatever lunacy they have in mind) and will mercifully be forgotten except, of course, the sexuality ones that will continue to drill holes directly into the underwater hull of the SS TEC.

The deeper truth is that her piece shows that TEC leaders feel a need to respond to the sudden negative media attention. Elite Episcopal leaders like Jefferts Schori and V. Gene Robinson are accustomed to secular praise for their brave and "holy" stands. Ridicule from the likes of VOL is one thing, but public ridicule from outside the church is new territory for them. They don't like it one little bit. In the coming days, will we see an op-ed piece in the New York Times coming directly from Presiding Bishop Jefferts Schori on the progressive stance of her church in the face of its orthodox despisers?

The one man who must surely be enjoying all this is, of course, the shadowy figure of David Booth Beers, Jefferts Schori's attorney who picks up millions of dollars in legal enough fees from every property lawsuit. Even if TEC sells the national headquarters, he will go on colleting his legal pound of flesh...in the name of (property) inclusivity of course.

Anglican Journalist David Virtue Rips, Blasts, Owns & Schools Bishop Gene Robinson (TEC)

A salute and hat tip to David Virtue.

http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=16294

Bishop Robinson, You are reaping what you have sown
Why the Bishop of New Hampshire is wrong

NEWS ANALYSIS

By David W. Virtue in Indianapolis
www.virtueonline.org
July 110, 2012

When the openly gay bishop of New Hampshire, Gene Robinson took a private communication one of my staff sent him and made its contents public inside the House of Bishops this week, he opened a can of worms that he has only himself to blame for. No one asked him to do that; he did it on his own recognizance. He did not ask my permission.

The communication was about rumors swirling around that he and his partner, Mark Andrew, whom he had married, were having "relationship problems and were entertaining divorce." The rumor was that they had separate bedrooms here in Indianapolis. In his blast at VOL, in front of 167 bishops, he complained about the "public scrutiny" of his life, but did not deny the rumors about what was happening in his personal life. Robinson publicized his relationship during the election process for Bishop of New Hampshire by his public appearances with Andrew. When he was consecrated, he publicly embraced and kissed Mark to the roar of approval from some 4000 sympathetic observers. I know. I was there.

The obvious contradiction in this puzzling situation is that Bishop Robinson stated that he would like questions directly asked to him, yet when a professional journalist asked him a question, he complained at length about it in the House of Bishops, without answering the question.

He screamed, "I have had just about all I can take."

Really. What about all the incredible damage he has caused by his consecration nearly a decade ago? As a result of his lifestyle, the Anglican Communion has de fact split, tens of thousands of Episcopalians have left the Episcopal Church, hundreds of churches have left TEC, many have lost properties, and rectors lives have been ruined by revisionist bishops that support Robinson's position including the screwball former bishop of Newark, John Shelby Spong. One bishop, Bob Duncan, was literally thrown out of the Episcopal Church without a trial so he formed a new Anglican Church in North America...all as a result of Robinson's unequivocal need for his behavior and "marriage" to another man be accepted into and by the church.

All Bishop Robinson did in his rant was demonstrate a level of self-pity that was pathetic to watch, but clearly enamored his fellow bishops who rose to give him a standing ovation.

Robinson's constant whine for public acceptance of his sexual preferences, his infernal narcissism and self-absorption, his videos and movie Love Free or Die, his worldwide travels in the Anglican Communion promoting pansexuality has caused Anglican Christians to be killed in Nigeria by angry fundamentalist Islamist mobs, invited the wrath and scorn of Imams and Mullahs, truncated evangelism in the Global South, forced Global South archbishops to disassociate themselves from him and The Episcopal Church, and indirectly forced an Archbishop of Canterbury to retire early because of the stress of the job and his failure to resolve the unresolvable. On top of all this, the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches have declared TEC anathema.

Robinson vociferously responded to the VOL e-mail saying, "It is nobody's damn business. For nine years I have borne a level of scrutiny beyond what should have been and there is a limit to what one person could bear."

Well, Bishop, it IS our "damn business" because you have made it our business by spending the last nine years pushing your behavior onto the global Anglican stage. If your life is falling apart, that is just as much a part of the Robinson story as your promotion of sodomy. You can't have it both ways. You went public and therefore your life from then on was open to public scrutiny. The old saying is true, "If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen." You have been roasting orthodox Anglicans over an open fire calling them all manner of names from "fundamentalist" to "homophobic". Now when someone questions your miserable life, you get all uppity and hurt and utter, "Why don't they leave me alone and mind their own business?" Oh, my God, please spare us.

In your rip you complained, "You can question my motives for saying this. I don't know what my motives are."

Really Bishop. Well, I think everyone knows what your motives are. They are manifestly clear to everybody with half a brain: you want the Episcopal Church, in fact every church (judging by your appearance at Presbyterian Church assemblies) to accept your lifestyle as good and right in the eyes of God. You want to influence the Global South by manipulating orthodox Anglicans in Uganda and wherever else you can to fall down and worship your pansexual god, the god of mayhem and confusion. You have seduced the Anglican Communion Office and, indirectly, jump-started a ludicrously named "Listening Process" to broker pansexuality into the whole Anglican Communion.

Robinson pleaded, "Let's not talk about reconciliation. Let's attempt it." He begged again, "Can we try together? Please."

No, Bishop, we can't, that ship has sailed. You have done too much damage to this church and to the Anglican Communion for any reconciliation ever to take place. Nigerian Anglicans, the largest body of Anglicans in the world, will no more entertain having you in their churches than they would Jefferts Schori. She is tarred with the same brush. You are history. Get used to it. When you retire from TEC, you will quickly be forgotten, but your legacy will live on in Mary Glasspool and the SS TEC will continue to slowly sink beneath the ecclesiastical waves under the weight of its own bad theology and even worse morals.

The truth, as you and we know, is that all clergy and bishops in the Episcopal Church realize that spouses, partners, and children become public figures after the ordination of one person in the family. This is discussed in seminary and formally and informally at many clergy gatherings. Any relationship (dating, partnered, or marriage) becomes a public reality in congregations and dioceses.

So allow me, Bishop, to quote you some Scripture, even as you misquoted Scripture in the HOB.

St. Paul in II Cor. 12 writes that he will boast but only in his weakness (v.5) Then Paul says this: "...a thorn was given me in the flesh, a messenger of Satan, to harass me, to keep me from being too elated. 8 Three times I besought the Lord about this, that it should leave me; 9 but he said to me, 'My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.' I will all the more gladly boast of my weaknesses, that the power of Christ may rest upon me."

So how about it, Gene? Why did you not turn your same sex attractions as a sign of your weakness over to God that the power of Christ may rest upon YOU?

St. Paul again: v.10 "For the sake of Christ, then, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities; for when I am weak, then I am strong."

Why did you not turn your sexual weaknesses, insults, hardships, etc. into an evangelistic moment to demonstrate that in your weakness God's power is revealed and you are made perfect in Him?

As one commentator put it, "The strength and power of God more perfectly shines forth in our weakness and infirmity; as the more weak we are of ourselves, the more illustrious is his grace in supporting us, and giving us the victory under all trials and conflicts when I am weak. The more I suffer for Christ, the more I perceive the effects of his all-powerful grace, which sustains, enlightens, and strengthens me: the more also the glory and power of God appeareth in me."

v.11 "I have been a fool." writes St. Paul.

So why couldn't you be a fool for Christ, Bishop Robinson, rejoicing in your infirmity and allowing the God of all grace to minister to you and to work through you to heal others "in your infirmity and weakness"? The whole AA movement (of which I gather you a member) is built on people declaring their utter weakness and helplessness in the face of alcohol and asking God for help. In their weakness, they turn to a "higher power" and draw strength, not to say they are cured, but that they are being made perfect in their weakness.

But these are to be borne with submission to the will of God, for his power is more evident in supporting man under the greatest trials, than in freeing him from the attacks. --- Power is made perfect.

St. Paul concludes the chapter with these words: v. 21 "I fear that when I come again my God may humble me before you, and I may have to mourn over many of those who sinned before and have not repented of the impurity, immorality, and licentiousness which they have practiced."

Paul knew his own weaknesses, his "thorn in the flesh" whatever it was kept him humble, just as your sexual desires should keep you humble knowing how easy it is to fail. The truth is, Bishop Robinson, we are to glory in our weakness, we are to suffer "for the name". Your only "suffering" is the constant whine for acceptance, something the Great Apostle would have renounced. The list of sins mentioned here undoubtedly encompasses immorality, your own included.


The tragic truth is that you have become an enemy of the gospel. You have turned the truth of the gospel into a lie and souls are being lost. Episcopalians are being swept into a Christless eternity because of what you are pushing and pandering. One day you will have to be held accountable for that loss. May God help you.

END

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Falls Church Anglican, VA, Prospers Despite Eviction Next Week from Property


http://babybluecafe.blogspot.com/2012/05/falls-church-anglican-continues.html

Thursday, May 10, 2012

The Falls Church Anglican continues ministries and missions as preparations underway to leave long-time home next week

Rector John Yates and the congregation of The Falls Church Anglican



FALLS CHURCH, Va. (May 10, 2012) - As the result of recent court action, The Falls Church Anglican, a congregation of 4,000 worshippers in Falls Church, Va., will soon move out of its historic home as it continues its ministry. Some in the congregation have worshipped on the church campus for more than 60 years, with the original property dating back almost 300 years. While the cost of leaving the property is great, members of The Falls Church Anglican are celebrating as they stand on their orthodox faith and continue to spread the transforming love of Jesus Christ beyond the church walls.

The Falls Church Anglican is being forced to leave its long-time home on May 15 as the result of a judicial ruling rejecting its request for a suspension (authorization to remain on its property during an appeal) of the January 2012 decision and March 2012 Final Order.

“While we are saddened by leaving this Christ-centered place of worship, we rejoice at the outpouring of encouragement and offers of assistance, including furnishings and building space from Presbyterians, Baptists, Catholics and other friends. Through these many blessings, we are equipped with the knowledge that God has great plans in store for our congregation. Ultimately, our passion for spreading the Gospel and reaching the lost will not wane,” said The Rev. Dr. John Yates, rector of The Falls Church Anglican.

According to Rev. Yates, the challenge has not hindered the congregation in its ministries and missions. “In spite of the litigation since 2006, we have established thriving, independent ‘daughter’ churches in Alexandria, Arlington, Vienna and beyond. We hope to plant our seventh daughter church this year in the District of Colombia. Meanwhile, we have more than 2,000 people in worship and fellowship each Sunday. Also, more than 450 teenagers participate in one of the largest youth programs on the East Coast.”

Junior Warden Carol Jackson added, “For several years we have been experiencing the power of healing prayer in our own congregation and recently began a partnership to extend that ministry in the Baileys Crossroads area, with Columbia Baptist Church and St. Anthony of Padua Catholic Church. Together, we minister to the poor and the immigrants among us in the Culmore Clinic. People from all walks of life, all faiths, and all economic situations, now have a safe place to ask for and receive prayer and excellent medical treatment.”

Between 2005 and 2007, The Falls Church Anglican and 14 sister Virginia congregations voted by overwhelming majorities to separate from The Episcopal Church and the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia. The move was taken because the congregations determined that The Episcopal Church had drifted so far from orthodox Christianity that they could not in good conscience remain under its spiritual authority.

“The cost to the congregation has been and will be huge. Locating available worship space for a church of our size and office space for over 100 staff and volunteer ministry leaders remains extremely challenging. In spite of this adversity, we remain steadfast in our decision to take a bold stand for the authority of Scripture,” said Senior Warden Sam Thomsen.

The Falls Church Anglican has remained at the forefront in the formation of orthodox Anglican institutions in North America. Members of the parish have been leaders in the creation of the Anglican Church in North America, the fast growing (nearly 1,000 congregations and 100,000 worshippers) national organization, and the Anglican Diocese of the Mid-Atlantic (38 congregations and nearly 6,000 worshippers each Sunday), in Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, and the District of Columbia.

“We leave without resentment or acrimony; we pray only the best for those who will follow us in our historic church, that the transforming Good News of Christ will always be proclaimed in this place,” Rev. Yates concluded.

On Sunday, May 13, The Falls Church Anglican will hold services at its current location, 115 E. Fairfax Street in Falls Church, Va. Services of praise and thanksgiving will also be held later that evening. All are welcome to attend and are invited to future worship services as well. Please check the church website (www.TFCAnglican.org) for service times and locations.

The Falls Church Anglican is a member congregation of the newly established Diocese of the Mid-Atlantic, a regional and growing diocese of the Anglican Church in North America dedicated to reaching North America with the transforming love of Jesus Christ. The Diocese consists of 38 member congregations.


Monday, January 3, 2011

Gene Robinson: Montanist Heretic

Gene Robinson: Montanist Heretic

When the history of the 19-21st century is written centuries from now it will treat a heretical movement named Liberal Protestantism (which by then will no longer exist as a major force) not very kindly. To get an idea of the ways it will be viewed, one can look at past heretical movements such as Gnosticism, Montanism, Arianism, etc.

I suspect that there will be strong evidence for treating the late 19th to 21st centuries as a period in which there was a great revival of Montanism. Texts like the this article by Gene Robinson in The Washington Post entitled "What Does the Bible Really Say About Homosexuality? Reading Texts of Terror." (see: http://onfaith.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/2010/12/what_does_the_bible_really_say_about_homosexuality_reading_texts_of_terror.html)
For a fuller analysis, I recommend the blog, The Reformed Pastor, which has an extensive analysis of this article here (http://reformedpastor.wordpress.com/2010/12/07/gene-robinson-teaches-the-bible/)

For more of the article, see:
http://politicsofthecrossresurrected.blogspot.com/2011/01/gene-robinson-montanist-heretic.html

Here's Gene: