Fulcrum Statement on Interventionist Anglican Mission in England
Executive Summary
- A name reflecting breakaway movements in the USA inviting the conclusion that this is the true purpose of the new society
- The creation of a society with a conservative evangelical 'political' agenda not simply mission
- The creation of a panel of bishops that signals the intention of offering alternative oversight without collaboration with senior leaders of the Church of England
- Indications that the society will take its own path in the authorisation of ministry, as evidenced by its approval of the recent secret ordinations in Kenya, which is an escalation of the earlier regrettable Southwark ordinations
The Full Statement
- the fundamental vision of working “within the Church of England dedicated to the conversion of England and biblical church planting”. But we believe that the latter must be conducted with a biblically based respect for order and hence proper regard to the authority of Church of England structures
- the concern to continue the pressure for maintaining the Anglican Communion's conservative view on sexual ethics within the Church of England and
- the desire to find appropriate Church of England processes for episcopal oversight for particular parishes, in extreme cases, where bishops do not abide by the House of Bishops' report 'Issues in Human Sexuality'
- the creation of a new mission society whose clientele seems to be restricted to conservative evangelicals and whose agenda appears much broader and more political than mission and evangelism
- the trajectory being set by this development in relation to AMiE’s relationship with the Church of England as a whole
- the name of the society which – unlike that of the St Augustine Society or the proposed Anglo-Catholic Society of St Wilfred and St Hilda - clearly echoes that of the breakaway Anglican Mission in America (AMiA). Fulcrum fully and unambiguously supports the full establishment of women bishops whilst also supporting the creation of a society for conservative evangelical opponents which will not compromise this crucial development. The nature of this society, however, is radically different.
- the creation of a panel of bishops who “aim to provide effective oversight in collaboration with senior clergy”. This represents the creation of a structure of alternative episcopal oversight apart from the Church of England. In the words of one of its supporters, Charles Raven, who himself left the Church of England some years ago – “in what sense will churches and clergy who are under the oversight of the AMiE’s panel of bishops rather than a diocesan bishop be ‘within the Church of England’?”
- the seemingly secret ordination of three unnamed English ordinands which recently occurred without public announcement in Kenya. This represents the authorisation of ministry apart from the Church of England and the irregular ordination of clergy to minister within the Church of England under the jurisdiction of another province of the Anglican Communion. It is thus a further escalation from the earlier and regrettable Southwark ordinations.
1 comment:
This reminds me of the initial reaction to AMiA. I say plow ahead and ignore this nonsense.
Post a Comment