d’Aubigne,
J.H. Merle. The Reformation in England,
Vol.1. Edinburgh: The Banner of
Truth Trust, 1994. D’Aubigne,
Merle.
Introduction
by S.M. Houghton
Book
One: England Before the Reformation:
1. Christ
Mightiers than Druid Altars and Roman Swords (2nd-6th
centuries)
2. Iona
versus Rome (6th-7th centuries)
3. Rome
Converts Britain (7th centuries)
4. Conflict
with Papal Supremacy (7th-11th centuries)
5. Iron
Age of Spiritual Slavery (11th-13th centuries)
6. Grossteste
and Bradwardine (13th-14th centuries)
7. Light
Streams from Lutterworth (1329-1380)
8. Morning
Star of the Reformation (1380-1384)
9. Lollard
Burnings (15th century)
10. New
Learning and New Dynasty (1485-1512)
11. War,
Marriage, and Preaching (1513-1515)
12. Wolsey’s
Rise to Power (1507-1518)
13. Need
for Reformation (1514-1517)
Book
Two: Revival of the Church:
1. Origin
of the English Reformation (1516-1519)
2. Greek
New Testament Awakens the Dead (1516-1521)
3. Persecutions
and Intrigue (1518-1520)
4. Storm
at Sodbury Hall (1522-1523)
5. Onslaught
of Luther (1517-1521)
6. Early
Days in Lincolnshire (1521-1522)
7. All
England Closed to Tyndale (1523-1524)
8. Bluff
Hugh Latimer (1485-1524)
9. Wolsey’s
Hopes and Fears (1523-1525)
10. Exile’s
Toil for a Nation’s Life (1524-1526)
11. Awakenings
in Cambridge (1524-25)
Book
Three: English New Testament and Court of Rome:
1. Year
of Grace (1526)
2. Oxford’s
Baptism of Suffering (1526-1528)
3. Severities
of Popery (1526-1528)
4. Tempest
Against the Truth (1526)
5. Divorce
Question Opens (1526-1527)
6. Ann
Boleyn (1522-27)
7. Bilney
in Strength and Weakness (1527)
8. Campaign
for Henry’s Divorce (1527)
9. Dilemna
and Duplicity of Clement VII (1527-1528)
10.
Royal Threats Counter Papal Cunning
(January to March 1528)
11.
Wolsey’s Desperate Demands (April to
July 1528)
Book
Four: Two Divorces
1. “A
Thousands Wolseys for One Anne Boleyn” (1528)
2. Scripture
and Spreading Revival (1527-1529)
3. Campeggio
Arrives in England (July to November 1528)
4. Search
for William Tyndale (1528-1530)
5. Pope
Burns His Bull (November 1528)
6. Wolsey
Between Scylla and Charybdis (1529)
7. More
and Tyndale: Theological Duel (1528-1529)
8. Queen’s
Pleadings Convict a Court (1529)
9. Trial
Ends in Farce (July 1529)
10. Tyndale
Received in a King’s Palace (1529)
11. Wolsey
Alone and Facing Ruin (Summer 1529)
12. To
Introduce Thomas Cranmer (1489-1529)
13. Dethronement
of Wolsey (October 1529)
14. New
Leaders and New Policy (October and November 1529)
15. “They
That Will Live Godly…” (1529-1531)
16. Wolsey
Falls Like Lucifer (1530)
Introduction
by S. M. Houghton, 1961
Jean Henry Merle d’Aubigne was born in a canton of
Geneva in 1794. His family were Huguenot expatriates from France after the
loving and tolerant Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes in 1685. Under divine
judgment and with depraved governmental energies, 1000s of France’s finest
fled. France’s loss and other countries
gains. d'Aubigne’s family was one of 1000s. In time, he studied at the
University of Geneva and took his Arts degree.
Mr. d’Aubigne then entered the Theological Faculty
which, by 1816, was Unitarian…probably worse than Romanism and that too from a
so-called Reformed outfit. Here, he met Frederick Monod, a fellow student and
future French Reformed Pastor and founder of the Free Churches of France (not
state-supported). He would also meet Louis Gaussen, another famed name from
this school and collaborative associations.
The trio—d’Aubigne, Monod, Gaussen—and 20-30 other
theological students encountered a London born Scotsman, Robert Haldane, a
Calvinist “of the old sort.” Though not
on the Faculty of Theology, he labored in Geneva. He began to “plow and sow the barren field”
in 1816 (4). He “arranged chairs on both sides of a long table” inside his
apartment. The table had copies of the
English, French, and German Bibles. He
also place Greek and Hebrew Testaments on the table. They fed him questions and
he provided answers. “One of the
professors” from this Reformed Geneva Faculty “paced up and down” in a high
dudgeon and with displeasure “noting their names in his pocket book” (4). One must wonder where the Devil attends Seminary. Which ones he’s been at? Which Cathedral
Churches too? Jesus said he’d be sowing
his tare-seeds in the field alongside the wheat; we should not be surprised.
Mr. Houghton offers a quote from Mr. Monod’s view
of the Mr. Robert Haldane:
What struck me most, and what struck us all, was
Mr. Haldane’s solemnity of manner. It
was evident he was in earnest about our souls, and the souls of those who might
be placed under our pastoral care, and such feelings were new to us. Then his meekness, the unwearying patience
with which he listened to our sophisms, our ignorant objections, our attempts
now and then to embarrass him y difficulties invented for the purpose and his
answers to each and all of us! But what astonished me, and made me reflect more
than anything else, was his ready knowledge of the Word of God and implicit
faith in its divine authority…We had never seen anything like this. Even after this lapse of years, I still see
presented to my mind’s eye his tall and manly figure, surrounded by the
students; his English Bible in his hand, wielding as his only weapon that word
which is the sword of the Spirit; satisfying every objection, removing every
difficulty, answering every question by a prompt reference to various passages,
by which objections, difficulties, and questions were all fairly met and
conclusively answered. He never wasted his time in arguing against our
so-called reasoning’s, but at once pointed with his finger to the bible, adding
the simple words, `Look here—how readest thou?’ `There it stands written with
the finger of God.’ He was, in the full sense of the word, a living
concordance…He expounded to us the Epistle of Romans which several of us had
probably never read, and which none of us understood…I reckon it as one of my
greatest privileges to have been his interpreter…being almost the only one who
knew English well enough to be thus honoured and employed” (5).
Mr. d’Aubigne was as impressed with Mr. Haldane as
was Mr. Monod. Mr. d’Aubigne says:
I met Robert Haldane and heard him read from an
English Bible a chapter from Romans about the natural corruption of man, a
doctrine of which I had never before heard. In fact I was quite astonished to
hear of man being corrupt by nature. I
remember saying to Mr. Haldane, `Now I see that doctrine in the Bible’ `Yes,’
he replied, ‘but do you see it in our heart?’ That was but a simple question,
yet it came home to my conscience. It
was the sword of the Spirit: and from that time I saw that my heart was corrupted,
and knew from the Word of God that I can be saved by grace alone. So that, if
Geneva gave something to Scotland at the time of the Reformation, if she
communicated light to John Knox, Geneva had received something from Scotland in
return in the blessed exertions of Robert Haldane” (5).
Mr. d’Aubigne would graduate and attend lectures
at Berlin and Leipzig, studying under Mr. Neander, the church historian. He also travelled in the land of Luther—a man
who would remain a “life-long inspiration” to Mr. d’Aubigne.
Ultimately, he started a seminary for
ministers. Louis Gaussen would join
him. Mr. d’Aubigne held his post as
Professor of Church History until his death in 1872. He visited all the chief libraries of Europe.
He spoke at Queen Victoria’s invitation at the Royal Chapel of St. James in May
1862.
Vol. 1 on The
Reformation in England covers the period to Cardinal Wolsey’s death in
1530. Vol. 2 covers the period of 1530
to Henry VIII’s death in 1547. The
anticipated Vol.3 was interrupted by his unexpected death.
A few distinctives:
·
He was “an expert in the field”
·
Though an “expert” he did not write
for “fellow experts but for ordinary Christian public” (4)
·
He was a “potent factor in holding
thousands to Protestant and Biblical truth” in England in the 19th century
“at a time when Rome was making a fresh effort to repair the ravages of
centuries” (9)
·
He was a “stimulator of interest in the
mind” (10)
·
As a “Confessor” or “Confessing
Churchman,” he actually believed—repeat, actually believed—in divine providence
and God ruling, over-ruling, hiding His power, and openly intervening in
history
·
He leaned on John Foxe’s Acts and Monuments
·
He viewed the Reformation “not as a
mere `act of state’ but as a movement on a great scale of the Spirit of God, a
work of divine initiative, a testimony of the truth as exemplified in the lives
and deaths of many 16th century men and women” (16).
Mr. Houghton affords a detour on Mr. John Foxe,
that godly Reformed, Protestant, and Evangelical Anglican, a man who “detested
royal cruelty” and who was an “Anglican Puritan.” Yet, Mr. Foxe would ever retain Queen
Elizabeth’s affection; he was a gentleman and not an obnoxious Puritan; she
called him “our beloved Father Foxe.”
But, back on point: Mr. Houghton in his detour
draws attention to Mr. Foxe’s victimization by some historians. Mr. (Sir) S.R. Maitland, a librarian at
Lambeth, poured scorn on Foxe in 1837. J.S. Brewer and James Gardiner followed
suit, but Mr. J.F. Mozley successfully rebutted the Maitland-school and Foxe
emerged “as a man of undoubted integrity and was of immense value” (13).
Mr. Houghton brings in a quote from Mr. (Prof.)
C.S. Lewis who reviewed Mr. Mozley’s scheme of rehabilitation (and thereby
rehabilitation of Mr. d’Aubigne indirectly who gets his stream of criticism
also). Here’s Mr. Lewis on Mozley’s Foxe:
Maitland had many successors, and the
nineteenth-century traditions represents Foxe as an unscrupulous propagandist
who records what he knows to be false, suppresses what he knows to be true, and
clams to have seen documents he has not seen.
In 1940, however, Mr. J.f. Mozley reopened the whole question and
defended Foxe’s integrity, as it seems to me, with complete success. From his examination, Foxe emerges, not
indeed as a great historian, but as an honest man. For early Church history he
relies on the obvious authorities and is of very mediocre value. For the Marian persecution his sources are
usually the narratives of eyewitnesses…There seems no evidence that Foxe ever
accepted what he did not himself believe or ever refused to correct what he had
written in the light of fresh evidence.
The most horrible of all his stories, the Guersney martyrdoms, was never
refuted, though violently assailed; in some ways the defence may be thought
scarcely less damaging than the charge.
And in one respect—in his hatred of cruelty—Foxe was impartial to a
degree hardly paralleled in that age” (14).
No comments:
Post a Comment