August 177 A.D. Remembering
Irenaeus.
Information
as to his life is scarce, and in some measure inexact. He was born in
Proconsular Asia, or at least in some
province bordering thereon, in the first half of the second century; the exact date is controverted, between the years 115 and
125, according to some, or, according to others, between 130 and 142. It is certain that, while still very young, Irenaeus had
seen and heard the holy Bishop Polycarp (d. 155) at Smyrna. During the persecution of Marcus Aurelius, Irenaeus was a priest of the Church of Lyons. The clergy of that city, many of whom were suffering imprisonment for the Faith, sent him (177 or 178) to
Rome with a letter to Pope Eleutherius concerning Montanism, and on that occasion bore emphatic
testimony to his merits. Returning to Gaul, Irenaeus succeeded the martyr Saint Pothinus as Bishop of Lyons. During the religious peace which followed the
persecution of Marcus Aurelius, the new bishop divided his activities between the duties of a pastor and of a missionary (as to which we have but
brief data, late and not very certain) and his writings, almost all of which
were directed against Gnosticism, the heresy then spreading in Gaul and elsewhere. In 190 or 191 he interceded
with Pope Victor to lift the sentence of excommunication laid by that pontiff
upon the Christian communities of Asia Minor which persevered in the practice of the
Quartodecimans in regard to the celebration of Easter. Nothing is known of the date of his death, which must have occurred at the
end of the second or the beginning of the third century. In spite of some isolated
and later testimony to that effect, it is not very probable that he ended his
career with martyrdom. His feast is celebrated on 28 June in the Latin Church, and on 23 August in the Greek.
Irenaeus
wrote in Greek many works which have secured for him an exceptional place in Christian literature, because in controverted
religious questions of capital importance they exhibit the testimony of a
contemporary of the heroic age of the Church, of one who had heard St. Polycarp, the disciple of St. John, and who, in
a manner, belonged to the Apostolic Age. None of these writings has come
down to us in the original text, though a great many fragments of them are
extant as citations in later writers (Hippolytus, Eusebius, etc.). Two of these works, however, have
reached us in their entirety in a Latin version:
- A
treatise in five books, commonly entitled Adversus haereses, and devoted, according to its true title, to the
"Detection and Overthrow of the False Knowledge" (see GNOSTICISM, sub-title Refutation of Gnosticism). Of
this work we possess a very ancient Latin translation, the scrupulous
fidelity of which is beyond doubt. It is the chief
work of Irenaeus and truly of the highest importance; it contains a
profound exposition not only of Gnosticism under its
different forms, but also of the principal heresies which had sprung
up in the various Christian communities, and
thus constitutes an invaluable source of information on the most ancient ecclesiastical literature from
its beginnings to the end of the second century. In refuting the heterodox
systems Irenaeus often opposes to them the true doctrine of the Church, and in this way
furnishes positive and very early evidence of high importance. Suffice it
to mention the passages, so often and so fully commented upon by theologians and polemical
writers, concerning the origin of the Gospel according to St. John (see GOSPEL OF SAINT JOHN), the Holy Eucharist, and the primacy
of the Roman Church.
- Of
a second work, written after the "Adversus Haereses", an ancient
literal translation in the Armenian language. This is
the "Proof of the Apostolic Preaching." The author's aim here is
not to confute heretics, but to confirm
the faithful by expounding the
Christian doctrine to them, and
notably by demonstrating the truth of the Gospel by
means of the Old Testament prophecies.
Although it contains fundamentally, so to speak, nothing that has not
already been expounded in the "Adversus Haereses", it is a
document of the highest interest, and a magnificent testimony of the deep
and lively faith of Irenaeus.
Of his other works only
scattered fragments exist; many, indeed, are known only through the mention
made of them by later writers, not even fragments of the works themselves
having come down to us. These are
- a
treatise against the Greeks entitled "On the Subject of
Knowledge" (mentioned by Eusebius);
- a
writing addressed to the Roman priest Florinus "On
the Monarchy, or How God is not the Cause of Evil" (fragment in Eusebius);
- a
work "On the Ogdoad", probably against the Ogdoad of Valentinus the Gnostic, written for the
same priest Florinus, who had
gone over to the sect of the Valentinians
(fragment in Eusebius);
- a
treatise on schism, addressed to
Blastus (mentioned by Eusebius);
- a
letter to Pope Victor against the Roman priest Florinus
(fragment preserved in Syriac);
- another
letter to the same on the Paschal controversies (extracts in Eusebius);
- other
letters to various correspondents on the same subject (mentioned by Eusebius, a fragment
preserved in Syriac);
- a
book of divers discourses, probably a collection of homilies (mentioned by Eusebius); and
- other
minor works for which we have less clear or less certain attestations.
The four
fragments which Pfaff published in 1715, ostensibly from a Turin manuscript, have been proven by Funk to be apocryphal, and Harnack has established the fact
that Pfaff himself fabricated them.
No comments:
Post a Comment