Reformed Churchmen

We are Confessional Calvinists and a Prayer Book Church-people. In 2012, we remembered the 350th anniversary of the 1662 Book of Common Prayer; also, we remembered the 450th anniversary of John Jewel's sober, scholarly, and Reformed "An Apology of the Church of England." In 2013, we remembered the publication of the "Heidelberg Catechism" and the influence of Reformed theologians in England, including Heinrich Bullinger's Decades. For 2014: Tyndale's NT translation. For 2015, John Roger, Rowland Taylor and Bishop John Hooper's martyrdom, burned at the stakes. Books of the month. December 2014: Alan Jacob's "Book of Common Prayer" at: http://www.amazon.com/Book-Common-Prayer-Biography-Religious/dp/0691154813/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1417814005&sr=8-1&keywords=jacobs+book+of+common+prayer. January 2015: A.F. Pollard's "Thomas Cranmer and the English Reformation: 1489-1556" at: http://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Cranmer-English-Reformation-1489-1556/dp/1592448658/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1420055574&sr=8-1&keywords=A.F.+Pollard+Cranmer. February 2015: Jaspar Ridley's "Thomas Cranmer" at: http://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Cranmer-Jasper-Ridley/dp/0198212879/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1422892154&sr=8-1&keywords=jasper+ridley+cranmer&pebp=1422892151110&peasin=198212879

Showing posts with label Presbyterianism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Presbyterianism. Show all posts

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Presbyterian Looks at Early American Revivalism

H/T to:  http://presbyterianblues.wordpress.com/2012/02/22/a-presbyterian-look-at-early-american-revivalism/  

A Presbyterian Look at Early American Revivalism



                              George Whitefield, Anglican Exhorter, Revivalist, and Enthusiast



Whether it was the First Great Awakening or a different and more subdued title would be appropriate, the American revival associated with George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards has profoundly influenced the sensibilities of American Protestantism. Today we look at an excerpt from an analysis of the Old Princeton theologian and churchman Charles Hodge.


The great revival, which about a hundred years ago visited so extensively the American churches, is so much implicated with the ecclesiastical history of our own denomination, that the latter cannot be understood without some knowledge of the former. The controversies connected with the revival are identical with the disputes which resulted in the schism which divided the Presbyterian Church in 1741.


…The men who, either from their character or circumstances, are led to take the most prominent part, during such seasons of excitement, are themselves often carried to extremes, or are so connected with the extravagant, that they are sometimes the last to perceive and the slowest to oppose the evils which so frequently mar the work of God, and burn over the fields which he had just watered with his grace. Opposition to these evils commonly comes from a different quarter; from wise and good men who have been kept out of the focus of the excitement. And it is well that there are such opposers, else the church would soon be over-run with fanaticism.


The term ‘revival’ is commonly used in a very comprehensive sense. It includes all the phenomena attending a general religious excitement; as well those which spring from God, as those which owe their origin to the infirmities of men. Hence those who favour the work, for what there is divine in it, are often injuriously regarded as the patrons of its concomitant irregularities, and those who oppose what is unreasonable about it, are as improperly denounced as the enemies of religion. It is, therefore, only one expression of that fanaticism which haunts the spirit of revivals, to make such a work a touchstone of character; to regard all as good who favour it, and all as bad who oppose it. That this should be done during the continuance of the excitement, is an evil to be expected and pardoned; but to commit the same error in the historical review of such a period, would admit of no excuse ….


That the state of religion did rapidly decline after the revival, we have abundant and melancholy evidence. Even as early as [March] 1744, (Jonathan) Edwards says, “the present state of things in New England is, on many accounts, very melancholy. There is a vast alteration within two years.” God, he adds, was provoked at the spiritual pride and self confidence of the people, and withdrew from them, and “the enemy has come in like a flood in various respects, until the deluge has overwhelmed the whole land. There had been from the beginning a great mixture, especially in some places, of false experiences and false religion with true; but from this time the mixture became much greater, and many were led away into sad delusions.”

Sunday, February 12, 2012

The Escondido Theology: A Reformed Response to Two Kingdom Theology by John Frame

A serious, significant and wide assault has been launched by the Rev. Mr. John Frame, Reformed Seminary, Orlando, FL against the entire faculty of Reformed theologians, historians and other professionals at Westminster Seminary, Escondido, FL. 

http://www.amazon.com/Escondido-Theology-Reformed-Response-Kingdom/dp/1937300005/ref=cm_rdp_product



The Escondido Theology: A Reformed Response to Two Kingdom Theology by John Frame

Amazon's Editorial Review says:


Review


Dr. John Frame has taken up the theological issue of Two Kingdom Theology and demonstrated his qualifications in addressing this popular view currently being advocated by various Reformed professors at Westminster Seminary in California. Dr. Frame provides critical insight and analysis of each Professor s published views advocating this doctrinal teaching. The tone and attitude of Dr. Frame is distinctively Christian and his response is clearly Reformed. Whether you advocate for or against Two Kingdom Theology, this book must be read prior to making any final determination as to the biblical and Reformed teaching on the subject. --Dr. Kenneth Gary Talbot President, Whitefield Theological Seminary

Frame has lived to see a vocal segment of the robust, rich tradition in which he was educated transformed into a narrow sectarianism that anathematizes other orthodox, Bible-believing Christians; elevates theological and church tradition to near equal status with God s Word; and diminishes that Word as the norm for all of life and thought. This book is the agonizing jeremiad of an older prophet who sadly diagnoses a desiccating illness of a friend and offers a prescription for a wholesome healing. Dr. P. Andrew Sandlin President, Center for Cultural Leadership --Dr. P. Andrew Sandlin President, Center for Cultural Leadership

In these pages John M. Frame clarifies in rather crystal clear terms what many of us have suspected for years: that the Escondido theologians, though claiming the Reformed heritage, are nonetheless out of accord with many of its most fundamental tenets. Broad in treatment, penetrating in scholarly analysis, and avoiding ad hominem, Frame builds a persuasive case the entire Protestant church should take the time to investigate. The sections that scrutinize the two kingdoms perspective of the Escondido teachers show especially the extent to which they have compromised a staple of Calvin s thought: the Lordship of God over all things. Dr. John Barber Pastor, Cornerstone Presbyterian Church --Dr. John Barber Pastor, Cornerstone Presbyterian Church


About the Author


Dr. John Frame is presently Professor of Systematic Theology and Philosophy at Reformed Theological Seminary in Orlando, Florida. He previously served as a Professor at both Westminster Seminary in Philadelphia and then as a founding faculty member at Westminster Seminary in Escondido, California.

Friday, December 23, 2011

Rev. Prof. Dr. Francis Nigel Lee (Presbyterian) Enters Church Triumphant This Morning, 23 Dec 2011


http://www.dr-fnlee.org/

We regret to report that the Rev. Prof. Dr. Francis Nigel Lee passed away this morning, 23 Dec 2011.  A valiant Warrior for Christ in the Reformed tradition.

The Works of Rev. Prof. Dr. F.N. Lee

God Triune, at the beginning, created the tri-universe. Gen. 1:1
God Triune in the Beginning - and for the 21st Century [HTML] [PDF]

Dr. Lee's paintings of creation week.





  About the author

Contact Dr Lee through his personal e-mail address: francisnigellee@dr-fnlee.org , or write to:



In September 2011, Dr Lee was diagnosed with incurable Motor Neurone Disease, alias Amytropic Lateral Sclerosis or Lou Gehrig's disease.

At 7.50 am Friday 23rd December, 2011, Nigel Lee was taken peacefully to his Lord.

(There are other works of Dr Lee which will be added to this Web site in the future.)


To buy Dr Lee's books (if they are in print!):
For the Jesus Lives series of booklets, contact Dr Lee at the above address.
For other books, contact the respective publishers. 


To view the PDF files, use Adobe Acrobat Reader. Download it for free here.
To download a PDF file to your PC:
  • For Internet Explorer: Right mouse click on the link, then select "Save Target As..." and save to whatever folder you wish.
  • For Netscape: Right mouse click on the link, then select "Save Link As..." and save to whatever folder you wish.
When both HTML and PDF versions available the file size given is for the larger of the two (generally PDF).
A suffix "[R]" after a date indicates that the document has been revised since first being put on this Web site. The date showing is the date of the latest upload.

Note: Netscape does not correctly print many of the HTML format files (the text is truncated at the right). It is suggested that you download the PDF version if you wish to have correct printing (or use Internet Explorer).

Title Format Date added Size
The Repudiation of Anabaptism by the Dutch Ex-Anabaptist Leader Obbe Philips HTML 12k
An Abridgement of Dr. N. Lee's Holy Harvests
[See below for the unabridged version.]
HTML 16k
The Sins of Adult Rebaptism and of Leaving One's Babies Unbaptised HTML 7k
Tongues at Corinth: Languages, not Ecstasies! HTML 101k
The Sovereignty of God In the Salvation of My Father's Slayer
(at Blue Banner)
HTML 10k
The Anabaptists and their Stepchildren HTML 10k
Antichrist in Scripture (at Blue Banner) HTML 27 August 1997
John's Revelation Unveiled - image of book cover. IMAGE 71k
John's Revelation Unveiled
Buy from: www.barnesandnoble.com; www.buy.com; www.amazon.com; www.prophecybookshelf.com
HTML PDF 26 December 1999 1.5M
John's Revelation Unveiled - Selected Bibliography PDF 26 December 1999 250k
Brothers Because of Bloodshed HTML 5 March 2000 88k
Sprinkling is Scriptural HTML PDF 11 March 2000 325k
Always Victorious! The Earliest Church not Pre- but Postmillennial HTML PDF 19 March 2000 113k
Quarterly Communion at Biblical Seasons Annually HTML PDF 29 January 2001 [R] 129k
God Saves the World! (Song) HTML & MIDI 24 April 2000 13k
St. Patrick's Early Morning Hymn (Song) HTML & MIDI 25 April 2000 6k
Calvin on the Weekly Christian Sabbath HTML PDF 7 May 2000 40k
Rev. Dr. John Owen Re-Presbyteri-anized HTML PDF 7 May 2000 316k
The Non-Preterist Historicism of John Calvin and the Westminster Standards HTML PDF 16 November 2000 107k
The Covenantal Sabbath HTML 21 May 2001
200 Theses Against Transubstantiation (replaces Fifty Five...) HTML PDF 11 March 2002 [R] 547k
Battle Hymn of the Christian Church (Song) HTML & MIDI 11 June 2000 17k
Dixie resurrected (Song) HTML & MIDI 11 June 2000 8k
What Does the Book of Revelation Mean? HTML PDF 13 August 2000 170k
What Does the Book of Revelation Mean? (paginated for printing as a booklet) PDF 10 September 2000 170k
Calvin on Islam HTML PDF 13 August 2000 116k
The man of Sin in Second Thessolonians HTML PDF 13 August 2000 111k
Daniel's Eschatology HTML PDF 13 August 2000 210k
Christocracy and the Divine Savior's Law for all Mankind HTML PDF 21 August 2000 165k
God Triune in the Beginning - and for the 21st Century HTML PDF 3 September 2000 217k
Dr. Lee's paintings of creation week. HTML 10 September 2000
Abraham Kuyper and the rebirth of true knowledge HTML PDF 10 September 2000 126k
King Alfred the Great and Our Common Law HTML PDF 15 September 2000 223k
John's Historicistic Epistles HTML PDF 16 September 2000 215k
The Historical Roots of the Australian Constitution HTML PDF 21 September 2000 144k
Excerpt from Rebaptism Impossible! (Acts 19:1-7) HTML RTF 7 October 2000 48k
The baptism of John and the fiery believer Apollos HTML RTF 7 October 2000 22k
The Christian Foundations of Australia HTML PDF 7 October 2000 232k
Women and Church Eldership HTML PDF 7 October 2000 70k
Biblical Ministries for Women HTML PDF 7 October 2000 56k
Luther on Islam and the Papacy HTML PDF 22 October 2000 444k
Calvin on the Papacy HTML PDF 26 October 2000 701k
Calvinism on the Holy Spirit HTML PDF 5 November 2000 375k
Table of Commandments HTML PDF 8 November 2000 11k
Calvin on the Law HTML PDF 12 November 2000 575k
Islam in the Bible HTML PDF 12 November 2000 298k
Daily Family Worship HTML PDF 3 December 2000 1,387k
The Christian Afrikaners HTML PDF 21 May 2001 705k
Biblical Predictions not Preterist but Historicist (2nd Ed.) HTML PDF 12 March 2001 [R] 367k
The Olivet Discourse and The Destruction of Jerusalem in Prophecy HTML PDF 17 December 2000 98k
Tiny Human Life [opens another page showing the contents] 22 January 2001
The Biblical Theory of Christian Education (3rd Edition) HTML PDF 12 March 2001 [R] 170k
Summary against Paidocommunion HTML PDF 12 February 2001 9k
Calvin on the Validity of 'Romish' Baptism HTML PDF 12 March 2001 719k
Catabaptism in the Presbyterian Church in America HTML PDF 12 March 2001 411k
Biblical Presbyterian Eldership HTML PDF 19 March 2001 43k
Biblical Presbyterian Presbyteries HTML PDF 19 March 2001 32k
Holy Harvests HTML PDF 18 June 2001 446k
Rev. Dr. Andrew Murray -- Calvinist, or Pentecostalist? HTML PDF 18 June 2001 215k
Mount Sinai and the Sermon on the Mount HTML PDF 24 September 2001 287k
Baptism Does Not Regenerate! HTML PDF 7 January 2002 1.1MB
Man's Origin and Destiny HTML soon! PDF 21 January 2002 950k
Miracles and Pseudo Miracles HTML soon! PDF 18 February 2002 6MB
Baby Belief Before Baptism [opens another page showing the contents] 15 April 2002
6th-Century Christian Britain from King Arthur to Rome's Austin HTML PDF 2 December 2002 300KB
The Godly Life of John Calvin HTML PDF 2 December 2002 114KB
Have You Been Neglecting Your Baby? HTML PDF 27 January 2003 70KB
What About Baptism? HTML PDF 27 January 2003 141KB
Jerusalem; Rome; Revelation - John's Apocalypse written before 70 A.D. PDF 8 December 2003 1.2MB
Life and Works - God's Creation Covenant with Adam PDF 25 March 2004 2MB
Are the Mosaic Laws for Today? PDF 12 July 2004 707KB
Dying Saved in Infancy: Are Any Dying Babies Lost? [opens another page showing the contents] 12 July 2004
Did God Die on Calvary? PDF 12 July 2004 64KB
God Didn't Die on the Cross PDF 12 July 2004 53KB
What Penalty for Child-molesting and Rape? PDF 2 August 2004 1.2MB
Calvin versus Child Communion PDF 2 August 2004 795KB
John Calvin - True Presbyterian PDF 2 August 2004 380KB
Bible and Qur’an: The Reliability of the Original Bible and the Original Qur’an PDF 2 August 2004 390KB
Luther on God's Law PDF 2 August 2004 590KB
White South Africa's Total Depravity PDF 2 August 2004 104KB
What Really Happened?: The Severe Limitations of Most Histories! PDF 2 August 2004 116KB
Calvinist Critique of 2003 "Auburn Affirmation" PDF 2 August 2004 741KB
God Triune in the Holy Bible PDF 2 August 2004 889KB
"I Own and Accept...": The Presbyterian Ordination Vow PDF 2 August 2004 695KB
The Covenantal Home Life of Rev. Matthew Henry PDF 2 August 2004 115KB
Paedocommunionism versus Protestantism PDF 2 August 2004 1.6MB
More Than One Archangel? - Who is "The Angel of the Lord"? PDF 2 August 2004 49KB
Adventures With God (F.N. Lee's Autobiography) Part 1
Part 2
PDF 12 December 2005 527KB
PDF 667KB
Pentecostalism: New Outpouring - or Ancient Heresy? Foreword
Part 2
PDF 12 December 2005 208KB
PDF 812KB
JeHoVaH, YaHWeH, and the Lord-Jesus: A study in the history of doctrine anent God’s name JHVH PDF 12 December 2005 1.4MB
Holy Scripture's Holy Spirit! PDF 12 December 2005 906KB
The Westminster Confession and Modern Society PDF 16 July 2007 114KB
Calvin on Worship PDF 16 July 2007 157KB
Ante-Nicene Trinitarianism PDF 16 July 2007 67KB
Calvin versus Idolatory PDF 8 August 2008 53KB
Who Is "The (Arch)Angel of the Lord"? PDF 7 September 2008 57KB
Common Law: Roots and Fruits
Roots of Common Law in Biblical, Iro-Scotic, Brythonic & English Jurisprudence – and Some of their Fruits in Great Britain, the United States, and Australia
2 March 2009
Nationality, Race and Intermarriage PDF 8 November 2009 148KB
Review of Rushdoony's Institutes of Biblical Law PDF 12 February 2010 26KB
Sunbeams at Sunsets (Support from Scripture for one’s latter days) PDF 24 September 2011 2.5MB
Let Us Pray [Sent by Dr Lee on 26 Nov 2011, with the note, "Probably my last writing; it took a month to write it, writing very slowly!"] PDF 23 December 2011 328 KB
The Roots & Fruits of Islam [Dr Lee's final production, sent on 14 Dec 2011, just 9 days before his death] PDF 23 December 2011 56 KB

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Reduction, Presbyterianizing, and Curtailment of Bishops


The Reduction of Episcopacy
by James Ussher

The Reduction of Episcopacy unto the form of Synodical Government Received in the Ancient Church: Proposed as an Expedient for the compromising of the now Differences, and the preventing of those Troubles that may arise about the matter of Church Government. 1656

Episcopal and Presbyteral Government conjoined.

By Order of the Church of England all Presbyters are charged (1) to minister the Doctrine and Sacraments, and the Discipline of Christ as the Lord hath commanded, and as this Realm hath received the same; and that they might the better understand what the Lord had commanded therein (2), the Exhortation of S. Paul to the Elders of the Church of Ephesus is appointed to be read unto them at the time of their Ordination; Take heed unto your selves, and to all the flock, among whom the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to Rule (3) the Congregation of God, which he hath purchased with his blood.

Of the many Elders, who in common thus ruled the Church of Ephesus, there was on President; Whom our Saviour in his Epistle to that Church in a peculiar manner styles the Angel of the Church of Ephesus (Rev 2.1); and Ignatius, in another Epistle written about twelve years after unto the same Church, called the Bishop thereof, betwixt which Bishop and the Presbytery of that Church, what an harmonious consent there was in the ordering of the Church government, the same Ignatius doth fully there declare, by the Presbytery with St. Paul (1 Tim 4.14) understanding the Company of the rest of the Presbyters or Elders, who then had a hand not only in the deliverance of the Doctrine and Sacraments, but also in the administration of the Discipline of Christ, for further proof whereof, we have that known testimony of Tertullian in his Apology for Christians. (4)

In the Church are used exhortations, chastisements and divine censure. For judgement is given with great advice as among those who are certain that they are in the sight of God; and it is the chiefest foreshowing of the judgement which is to come, if any man have so offended that he be banished from the Communion of Prayer, and of the Assembly, and of all holy fellowship. The Presidents that bear rule therein are certain approved Elders, who have obtained this honour, not by reward, but by good report; were no other (as he himself elsewhere intimates) but those from whose hands they used to receive the Sacrament of the Eucharist (5). For with the Bishop who was the chief President (and therefore styled by the same Tertullian in another place (6) Summus Sacerdos for distinction sake) the rest of the Dispensers of the Word and Sacraments joined in the common government of the Church; and therefore, where in matters of Ecclesiastical judicature Cornelius Bishop of Rome used the received form of gathering together the Presbytery (7); of what persons did consist, Cyprian, sufficiently declares, when he wishes him to read his letters (8) to the flourishing Clergy which there did preside or rule with him, the presence of the Clergy being thought to be so requisite in matters of Episcopal audience that in the fourth Council of Carthage, it was concluded, that the Bishop might hear no man’s cause without the presence of his Clergy, and that otherwise the Bishops sentence should be void, unless it were confirmed by the presence of the Clergy, which we find also to be inserted into the Canons of Egbert, who was Archbishop of York in the Saxons times, and afterwards into the Body of the Canon Law itself.

True it is, that in our Church this kind of Presbyterial government has been long disused, yet seeing it still professes, that every Pastor has a right to rule the Church (from when the name of Rector also was given at first unto him) and to administer the Discipline of Christ, as well as to dispense the Doctrine and Sacraments, and the restraint of the exercise of that right proceeds only from the custom now received in this Realm, no man can doubt but by another Law of the Land this Hindrance may be well removed: And how easily his ancient form of government by the united Suffrages of the Clergy might be revived again, and with what little show of alteration, the Synodical conventions of the Pastors of every Parish might be accorded with the presidency of the Bishops of each Diocese and Province; the impartial Reader may quickly perceive by the perusal of the ensuing Propositions.

1. In every parish the Rector or Incumbent Pastor together with the Churchwardens and Sidesmen may every week take notice of such as live scandalously in that Congregation, who are to receive such several admonitions and reproofs, as the quality of their offence shall deserve; and if by this means they cannot be reclaimed, they ay be presented unto the next monthly Synod; and in the mean time debarred by the Pastor from access to the Lord’s Table.

2. Whereas by a Statute in the 26 year of King Henry the eight (revived in the first of Queen Elizabeth) Suffragans are appointed to be erected in twenty six places of this Kingdom, the number of them might very well be conformed unto the number of the several rural Deaneries into which every Diocese is subdivided; which being done, the Suffragan (supplying the place of those who in the ancient Church were called Chorepiscopi) might every month assemble a Synod of all the Rectors, or Incumbent Pastors within the Precinct, and according to the Major part of their votes conclude all matters that should be brought into debate before them.

To this Synod the Rector and Churchwardens might present such impenitent persons, as by admonition and suspension from the Sacrament, would not be reformed; who if they should still remain contumacious and incorrigible, the sentence of Excommunication might be decreed against them by the Synod, and accordingly be executed in the Parish where they lived.

Hitherto also all things that concerned the Parochial Ministers might be referred, whether they did touch doctrine or their conversation; as also the censure of all new Opinions, Heresies, or Schisms, which did arise within that Circuit; with liberty of Appeal, if need so require, unto the Diocesan Synod.

3. The Diocesan Synod might be held once or twice in the year, as it should be thought most convenient: Therein all the Suffragans and the rest of the Rectors or Incumbent Pastors (or a certain select number) of every Deanery within that Diocese might meet, with whose consent, or the Major part of them, all things might be concluded by the Bishop or Superintendent (call him whither you will) or in his absence by one of the Suffragans whom he shall depute in his stead to be Moderator of that Assembly. here all matters of greater moment might be taken into consideration, and the Orders of the Monthly Synods revised, and (if need be) reformed: And if here also any matters of difficultly could not receive a full determination; it might be referred to the next Provincial or National Synod.


4. The Provincial Synod might consist of all the Bishops and Suffragans, and such other Clergy as should be elected out of every Diocese within the Province; The Primate of either Province might be Moderator of this meeting (or in his room, some one of the Bishops appointed by him) and all matters be ordered therein by common consent as in the former Assembly.

This Synod might be held every third year, and in the Parliament do then sit (according to the Act for A Triennial Parliament) both the Primates and Provincial Synods of the Land might join together, and make us a National Counsel: Wherein all appeals from inferior Synods might be received, all their Acts examined, and all Ecclesiastical constitutions which concern the state of the Church of the whole Nation established.

END.

The Form of Government here proposed, is not in any point repugnant to Scripture; and that the Suffragans mentioned in the Second Proposition, may lawfully use the power both of jurisdiction and Ordination, according to the Word of God, and the Practice of the ancient Church.

back to top


ENDNOTES

(Not all the endnotes have been copied because of the difficulty of reading them in the manuscript available. Whereas Ussher gave most of the notes in Latin the Engish version of Schaff has been used here.)

The form of Ordaining Ministers

Ibid. ex Acts 20.17,28

poimainein – so taken in Matt 2.6 and Rev 12.5 & 19.15

“In the same place also exhortations are made, rebukes and sacred censures are administered. For with a great gravity is the work of judging carried on among us, as befits those who feel assured that they are in the sight of God; and you have the most notable example of judgment to come when any one has sinned so grievously as to require his severance from us in prayer, in the congregation and in all sacred intercourse. The tried men of our elders preside over us, obtaining that honour not by purchase, but by established character.” Tertullian : Apology Chapter 39.

“We take also, in congregations before daybreak, and from the hand of none but the presidents, the sacrament of the Eucharist” Tertullian : The Chaplet or De Corona, Chapter 3

Tertullian : On Baptism, Chapter 17

“The whole of this transaction therefore being brought before me, I decided that the presbytery should be brought together; (for there were present five bishops, who were also present today;) so that by well-grounded counsel it might be determined with the consent of all what ought to be observed in respect of their persons.” The Epistles of Cyprian : Epistle 45 Cornelius to Cyprian

The Epistles of Cyprian : Epistle 53 to Cornelius

Friday, November 19, 2010

Westminster Bookstore - The Life of Charles Hodge

Westminster Bookstore - Reformed Books - Low Prices - Flat Fee UPS Shipping - The Life of Charles Hodge (Hardcover) Hodge, A. A. 9781848710900

Publisher's Description: Charles Hodge (1797-1878) is acknowledged to be one of the most influential leaders in the history of the church in America, an perhaps the greatest American theologian of the nineteenth century. Yet paradoxically he confessed, "I have never advanced a new idea", and remarked of Princeton Seminary where he taught for more than fifty years, "I am not afraid to say that a new idea never originated in this Seminary." Hodge went on to explain that his sole object had been to state and vindicate the doctrines of the Reformed faith, not to improve on them. His great achievement, therefore, was that what might have seemed a recipe for stagnation and decline gave rise rather to a period of extraordinary vitality, vigour and advance in the American Presbyterian Church.

This Life of Charles Hodge by his son and successor, Archibald Alexander Hodge, written shortly after his father's death, brings together a wealth of material from Hodge's letters, diaries, journal articles, and personal reflections. The story is likely to appeal to more than one kind of reader. Those who know Hodge as the author of a famous Systematic Theology and several Bible commentaries, but have little knowledge of the man, will find here an absorbing account of his joys and sorrows, struggles and victories, travels and friendships, and strongly held views on a vast range of subjects; while those who, with C.H. Spurgeon, "value every morsel about the Princeton worthies", will delight in the mine of information here opened up. In addition, those with a more general interest in American and nineteenth-century history will be able to assess the reactions of a conservative but generous-minded thinker to the Civil War, the expansion of the United States, and almost every major issue of the time. For all kinds of readers, Charles Hodge will come alive in these pages.

672 Pages
Published October 2010

Friday, November 5, 2010

Diane Bish - Purcell - Trumpet Tune


Diane Bish on Purcell's "Trumpet Tune." Thankfully, we Anglicans did not toss great music to the loontoondom and rashdom of the radical Puritans.

Here is a Presbyterian organist's rendition of the great organist from St. Paul's, London. A lady who appreciates great music, unlike the radical Reformers.

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Updated Reflections on R.C. Sproul by Donald Philip Veitch

Who is the Rev. Dr. Robert Charles Sproul (hereafter called “RC” as he would affectionately be known in later years)? Where did he come from? When did he gain influence? Is he worth reading or hearing? What is his significance today? These and other questions, answered more largely in later years, began in 1974. As the story developed, so did a friendship--one that endures to 2010, thirty-six years later and a phone-call away for a dinner or lunch.


I first encountered the Rev. Dr. Robert Charles Sproul, or RC, at the “Philadelphia Conference on Reformed Theology” (for brevity, hereafter called PCRT) in April, 1974. We had no internet, DVD, IPod or social networking resources in those days. If memory serves me, I do not think VHS and video-resources were widely available. Even audio-cassettes were coming of age more widely. For crying out loud, although we had radios, "audio cassette" players in automobiles in those days was becoming a pleasant luxury. In context, put simply, RC was an "unknown" in the larger world of Presbyterianism. Yet, here was RC, an unknown man in 1974, a veritable beginner dwarfed by the grander context of the PCRT.


By way of larger context, this weekend event--the PCRT--was not a conference for backwoods prophets or tub-thumping revivalists. RC was not that. He never would have been invited had he been such. But who was he and why was he at the PCRT? The PCRT typically had drawn academic notables from the wider conservative, evangelical, Presbyterian and Anglican world: Drs. John Gerstner, James Montgomery Boice, Roger Nicole, James Innes Packer, Eric Alexander and others. These speakers had earned doctorates from world class institutions such as Harvard, Princeton, Oxford, Edinburgh, and Westminster Seminary. I could think of others who should have been invited. But as it was, these were all-stars for this 1974 PCRT.


By way of family lore on my father’s side, the "Princetonian Presbyterians" were dinner table names to me from youth, an "an august and scholarly breed" I was told. Mother listened, but as a cardiology nurse she more often than not spoke about "PQS-waves, arrhythmias, and defibrilators" (and she was constantly studying books and journals on issues of the heart and attending medical conferences). But to the point, Dad had read the Princetonian titans and spoke of a different heart, the spiritual "heart and mind," if I may. Dad's treasure-trove of one-liners, quips, snippets and asides remain. "The Princetonians have a better handle on God, sin, the Cross and the atonement," I was advised. "Yes, they have a better picture of man and reality," was solemnly stated. The Hodges, B.B. Warfield, Henry Green, Robert Dick Wilson, J. Gresham Machen, and John Murray were familiar names to me in 1974, even if I had not digested their writings. "Henry Green forever answered Wellhausen in the 1890's," a phrase that meant a whole lot more to me in later years. Dad also had an high regard for the old Anglicans. "Very scholarly and careful" was the phrase. After all, that was my paternal patrimony. But, what did I know? I was a lad. "Dad, could you pass the potatoes, please?" Even my father asked in 1974, “Who is R.C. Sproul?” Neither my father nor I had answers let alone clues. But, new to this all-star lineup of heavy hitters in 1974, an event I attended, was RC Sproul. Who was he? Was there a fit here at the PCRT? Was there a back story? There always is.


This broader context made the suspended questions about RC even more pointed. The history, the theologians, the architecture and the music at the PCRT afforded theology, sound, color, and line—stark lineaments that dwarfed this 30's-something “new join” on the dais. The conference was held at the historic landmark church, Tenth Presbyterian, 17th and Spruce Streets, Philadelphia, a church not far from other historic landmarks in downtown Philadelphia. Additionally, Tenth Presbyterian had been known historically for its illustrious line of Pastor-Scholar-Writers from the Princeton-tradition, a tradition made known to me at the family dinner hour. I grew up on the old names and books. To add further gravity, the “Princeton School” of the 19th and 20th century had itself possessed an esteemed place in the academic literature on American Presbyterianism, both primary and secondary. The Pastors from Tenth, then or now, were not loud yahoos. Neither were the Conference speakers at the PCRT. Dating to 1829 and standing through various traumas in American history—the Civil War, WW1, WW11 and other national traumas including the terminal illness of 19th and 20th century theological liberalism—Tenth Presbyterian stood immutably and intelligently as an established witness to the Triune God, Confessional Presbyterianism and the Westminster Confession of Faith, 1646. Tenth was built along Gothic lines and enshrined a majestically capacious, ivory-coloured pulpit, a mahogany-paneled apse, marble columns for the outer aisles, mahogany pews, yellow-stained glass windows, informative and historic wall inscriptions over decades, along with the mute but perpetual witness of a preserved interior. Whatever else had changed through preceding decades, something permanent was etched into the very character and life of Tenth Presbyterian. Tenth’s congregation had kept faith with its Confessional patrimony and its matrimonial heritage, ever strong, ever protective, ever wise, ever the same, ever Biblical, ever theological and ever Confessional--ever begetting new believers by the Law-Gospel witness and ever nourishing the congregation by Word and Sacrament. The faith of the forbears in 1829 spoke afresh, unchangingly and as intelligently in 1974 as they had in 1829. “If the walls could talk,” I wondered in 1974 as I sat in the pew at Tenth Presbyterian. “If the unchanging theology of Tenth’s Scholar-Pastors and the Princetonian lions could be heard again?” I mused. “Beam me back in time,” I queried. Although I was young at the time, the PCRT speakers were known to me by oral and literary tradition through Dad and were anticipated at this gala event…along with the wider context. One of these theologians--widely known and published--played with this toddling scribe and his doodling toys--crawling around on all fours with me--under a dinner table in the Veitch home, an incident distant in the past compared to this present moment in 1974. This family friend and double-doctored theologian, Dr. Roger Nicole, was also speaking at the 1974 PCRT. Yet, here, in 1974, at this place and in this time, stood RC behind the ivory pulpit, a novice, a "new join" with his oddities. Indubitably, RC was a lesser light in this effulgent galaxy. What was the RC-story? Would he have staying power? “God alone knows” was the only imaginable answer.


While RC was dwarfed by history, Tenth's abiding fidelity to the past, her famous theologians and pastors, her Confessional patrimony, and its architecture, the music added another substantive tension to the unanswered questions about RC. The Conferences conscientiously presented historic Cathedral and parish traditions in music. The first rate pipe organ, paid and doctored organists, paid choristers, and the Westminster Brass intensified the grandeur and majesty as fifteen hundred worshippers heartily sang noble hymns from an hoary past in this historic place of immutable and stable Confessional integrity. Here there were no choruses with “seven words repeated eleven times” (as it is with “7-11” music) with raucous, thumping Praise Bands, but here were grand hymns from the centuries past with substantial musical enhancements and ennobling lyrics, carefully crafted by top shelf writers shaped by the old paths. The hymns themselves were weighty and substantive "sermons." That was another piece in the larger context for this PCRT, the music. But out of nowhere came this “new join,” RC? Who, pray tell, was he? Somehow, he fit and—yet oddly— somehow he did not fit. There were disjunctions; were there continuities?


The glossy brochure for the 1974 PCRT itself answered few questions about RC. The brochure gave wider details about the Conference itself, but included only brief academic backgrounds on the speakers. This brochure helped. But only tidbits emerged about RC. He graduated with a BA (Westminster College), a 90-hour Master of Divinity (Pittsburgh Seminary) and the Drs. in theology (Free University of Amsterdam). Academically, there was a fit for the conference. That assumption and expectation was a given. The brochure mentioned a "Ligonier Study Centre" in some unknown--perhaps forlorn--place in western Pennsylvania. However, unlike the other speakers, there were no publications as I recall. This was obviously a cameo appearance for RC. It was early in his career. Time would tell. The jury was out for quite some time. Glossy PCRT brochures for subsequent conferences were equally unhelpful, although a bevy of audio-resources was emerging and clarifying RC’s place in the national storyline of 2010--once dwarfed, but now a giant, once a theological Ensign but now a Fleet Admiral, but I have fast-forwarded too much.


As the years would pass, I would learn that RC earned his doctorate under the famous Professor of Amsterdam, the Rev. Dr. G. C. Berkhouwer. But again, this emerged in later years. Although young myself, I had read a few of Dr. Berkouwer's books and was familiar with the titles yet-to-be read. The learned Dr. Berkhouwer wrote of complex theological matters almost journalistically and quite readably, without any loss of substance--a signature line that would characterize RC throughout the years. This was a well-known name; Professor Berkhouwer was widely published. He had been invited by the Vatican to attend the Second Vatican Council, 1962-1965, as a “Protestant observer.” The Roman Curia paid the bills for Dr. Berkhouwer’s presence, no minor thing and an high honor for an academic theologian of any stripe. While Professor Berkhouwer was well known in 1974, RC surely was not. In later years, I would learn that RC had sustained examinations from and had earned his doctorate under the Rev. Dr. Berkhouwer. This tiny, but important tidbit, unknown to many of us in 1974, was known to the gate-keepers of the PCRT. This tidbit, his background, gave RC a foot in the door to this august sanctuary and its wider context. RC's background may even have opened the door to his inclusion in future histories of 20th-21st American religion--but historians will sift these new and pending questions. If RC was dwarfed in 1974 by the PCRT context, by 2010, RC would be a man shaping other contexts beyond the PCRT.


That was 1974; today is 2010. Subsequent years intensified newer questions while resolving old ones. In the 1970’s, who was RC? What was he doing? Whence cometh he? By 2010, these were non-issues. By 2010, the questions changed. Dr. Sproul had achieved a significant place in not just American Presbyterian circles, but in larger circles as well. As an Anglican, I am one of those, but I go too quickly. While an official or unofficial biography awaits publication, this scribe presents a few clues to explain this scribe’s abiding interest in the man. By 2010, a national constituency had asked and answered those same lingering questions that I had had in 1974, but again, I go too quickly.


In 1974 and throughout the earlier years, R.C. had the disconcerting if not distinctive air of a “smug, collegiate frat boy” with an ever-faint yet off-putting trace of hubris. Ah, but we all are sinners as justified saints, confessing our "manifold sins and wickednesses which we, from time to time, most grievously have committed" and, by faith alone, simultaneously clinging to Christ's righteousness alone...all of us with intolerable sins covered by Christ's satisfactions for us. Just perhaps--the young RC saw the gravity, grandeur and importance of the context and, in elemental insecurity, summoned a youthful courage which was but a masquerade for the inner reality. Whatever the case, it did not play well from a godly playbook, especially in the presence of His High and Holy Majesty. It was off-putting by contrast with the other established dignitaries in the grander context. RC’s lectures were surely scholarly and understandable, but this trace of a slight smugness remained and, candidly, ill-befitted the context. How did this piety square in a theologian? In this context? On this point, fortunately, RC’s expression of a smug hubris--if it was that--receded in later years. Who ever could abide a backward-tilt of the head with an air of smugness, veiled or otherwise? In anyone, it is insufferable--but that was a doctrine and piety conditioned in this scribe by the old Prayer Book, an Anglican ethos that never made a debut--regrettably--at Tenth or at the PCRT, but I digress.


Fortunately, a more dominant and eclipsing quality was evident in RC, a quality that would prevail and entertain, and one that would strongly mitigate this lingering perception of hubris. Unquestionably, RC had the uncanny appearance and style—identically so—of one of my favorite television characters and shows. The popular TV show, “Colombo,” was a “who dunnit” detective series. The actor was Peter Falk who played Lieutenant Colombo. Colombo was an oft-humorous, Trench-Coat-wearing, ever-rumpled, cigar-smoking, note-taking and ever-inquisitive detective who never missed a beat and who always got his man. Colombo often appeared to be “off task” in his investigations and somewhat disoriented, just "a bit off," when, contrary to appearances, he was constantly “on task” and tracking to target. That was integral to Lieutenant Colombo’s character. At this PCRT, we had a theological Colombo on the loose—both in style, mannerisms, and even physical appearance! RC was frumpy, rumpled, investigative, and was asking Socratic questions with his intuited half-answers that—despite other appearances to the contrary—he was plying and answering with considerable astuteness. Behold, RC was working the questions and "getting us" to the issue. RC might say, "I just don't understand (reader, fill in the blank)..." It was a cue. An answer was coming. RC understood--even the "nonsense" he understood and was about to explain, sensically. One could expect larger, fuller, and satisfying answers to emerge. This was engaging and charming, if not disarming. With quixotic disorientations of furrowed brows with pendant questions, now and then, RC even treated us to Colombo-like head-scratchings as he hounded the theological questions to greater clarity. It was not feigned upon further reflection. The only missing thing from RC’s persona was Colombo’s half-smoked, unlit and vintage cigar. A cigar, lit or unlit, at a PCRT or Tenth Presbyterian clearly would have been out of place--in a public pulpit. Otherwise, RC was straight out of Colombo’s playbook. Even with these things, however, RC still seemed disjointed and misplaced in the larger context of Tenth Presbyterian, the PCRT, its history, its architecture, its line of Princetonian titans, its music, its congregational fidelity through decades and this current roster of Conference all stars. In 1974, RC was untested, new, and young. Was he a rising star with staying power? Or, was he a falling star--a flash in the night, brilliant but for a moment? Time would answer many questions but raise others, e.g. what is RC’s long-term impact? But, I get ahead of myself.


As the PCRT Conferences rolled through the years along with RC’s unabatedly growing popularity, these Conferences expanded to other cities, e.g. Los Angeles, New York City, Boston, Chicago and Atlanta. RC was ever present in the lineup on the dais. During one PCRT session in Philadelphia, Dr. Sproul, doffed his sport coat, rolled up his sleeves and said, "Now...let's get started." A USMC Captain and I exchanged glances and chuckled. Vintage RC. It did not fit, but it did fit; we loved him. This rumpled RC, ever-learned but always clear, became a household name in Presbyterian circles and beyond; he had earned a place in the galaxy, a place at the table. He was “here and there” to stay. His name was not going away. From 1974 to 1990, RC began publishing widely; he had a growing video-ministry; his conference ministry expanded; his name appeared increasingly in Presbyterian, as well as evangelical, magazines; his name appeared at famous schools as a “guest” or “visiting” Professor; he taught with some regularity at Gordon-Conwell and Reformed Seminaries; his Presbyterian constituency expanded to include those from other traditions. Arguably, his video-series on the “Holiness of God,” an exposition of Isaiah 6, would become a staple and classic for thousands of families and churches. All told, by 2010, RC may have written as many as sixty books as well as appearing in volumes of DVD, VHS and audio-cassette resources. RC even developed his own annual conference, The Ligonier Conference, in addition to his continuing appearances at PCRT Conferences. More information is available at http://www.ligonier.org/. An half-way adequate brief may be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._C._Sproul. A partial list is offered, but fails to comprehend the full scope. Retrieved 30 August 2010. While paltry in detail, it affords a working summary. By 2005 or so, he had a nationally syndicated radio program called “Renewing Your Mind.” Several brief video-segments have migrated, willy nilly, to http://www.youtube.com/. One example among many: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zArjHbikAHU&feature=fvst. This rising star of 1974, and an “unknown” for several years thereafter, was firmly in the Presbyterian and wider evangelical orbit by 2010. Beyond these things and more personally, RC had become a friend. Thirty-six years later, I take time to reflect on a memorable man, some issues, a few changes, a few answered as well as newer questions, while paying tribute to a standing friendship of many years...and honoring a beloved mentor.


Upon entry to the military in the early 1980’s, this scribe had fewer opportunities to attend the PCRT conferences. While I had brief conversations with RC at the conferences, fewer direct exchanges were to be had. However, I purchased the audio-resources every year—up to and including 2010. This scribe was able to attend several Ligonier Conferences and purchase the audio series from them. The content was played again and again. The theology was engrained and formative. Notwithstanding numerous military moves and deployments, I purchased all of RC’s books and video-audio-series as they came to market; I spent several thousand dollars doing so; by proxy, RC had become the Presbyterian mentor and companion of an Anglican student since 1974—namely, yours truly. Over the years, a literary friendship developed as snail-mail letters were consistently exchanged. I wrote from deserts, fields and places afar and afloat—the Mediterranean Sea, Atlantic Ocean, Indian Ocean, and the Persian Gulf to mention a few. My ships’ names had one common theme and name: USS NEVER DOCK, or USS ALWAYS GONE. Despite the movements, RC never missed a port; he always wrote back; I never will forget one letter received while sitting in an 120-degree desert with thousands of Marines around; each letter was source of encouragement with further points for reflection. This pre-existing context from 1974 to the early 1990’s shaped the ensuing years of friendship and respect—RC-wards by this student. By proxy, by letters and by video-audio resources, RC was ever present.


Of note, once instance comes to mind in this friendship of thirty-six years. In 1996, twenty-two years after my first encounter with him, I shared dinner with RC and Vesta, his wife, in the historic town of Amalfi, Italy, a coastal hamlet about seventy miles south of Naples (Naples, the "hell hole" of the Mediterranean and second only to a greater and more iniquitous hell hole, Rome, but I digress with this understatement) and abutting the historic town of Salerno, Italy. It was a “Table Talk” moment for me, a term or phrase, if I may, that Martin Luther used to describe his dinner conversations with students… over food and German beer…occasionally, with Luther quaffing down copius draughts of German beer over serious questions, but I digress. RC and I were not wantonly indulging, but a parallel existed. (The teacher-student identities were clear, then as now. It could be a stretch to call Sproul “a Martin Luther” but it is not that far off. Historians will assay that unanswered question.) In 1996, RC and Vesta were travelling for the summer month of June, 1996; I, as always, was travelling during summer, fall, winter and spring months. We were able to coordinate complex schedules for this single dinner—from afar and by letter; internet was not a possibility at this point and cellular phones were just coming of age. The details worked. Over a good Italian meal and a few bottles of wine, the topics were varied. As the evening passed however, notably and memorably, our “Table Talk” interaction zeroed in on the “state of American evangelicalism.” This had become a subject of widening inquiry in the 1990’s—in the literature, in conferences, and other venues. Given RC’s front seat to the discussions at a national level, given his writings and those of other notable writers, given his close relationships to opinion-influencers, RC was unquestionably a “Go-to-Guy” for any student, a Professor with a developed track record, a Professor to be heard. This subject had also been my own question for several years. Here we were in Amalfi, Italy, with heavy waves crashing ominously against the jagged rocks below where we sat. It was a defining moment for this scribe. Here was my friend and mentor, AKA “Lieutenant Colombo,” scratching his head thoughtfully as we dined over Italian spaghetti and bruschetta, asking questions, giving astute observations on American evangelicalism and its literature, naming names, making strong assertions and—in the meanwhile—asking, “Isn’t this meal delightful? Another glass of wine, Phil?” It was vintage Colombo. It was vintage RC, whether private or public, the past to 1974 or the present until 1996. It was Sproul himself without editors. It was RC "on screen and off screen." This was an appetizer and main course of insights from a Master! As the night closed about 1 A.M. and as we were about to part, RC said, staring at me and with a salute to me (a reference to my profession of arms but also the dominant subject of the evening), “I intend to sail into harm’s way.” I promptly returned the salute and said, “Very well, Sir, I respectfully recommend that we steam full flank speed, maintain course and bearing, and straight into harm’s way.” He directed, “Carry on!” We chuckled, parted and pondered these things later. As I returned to my hotel room, the pounding waves crashed. For RC, that mission objective had not changed. That objective was ever-there, ever-probing and ever-insightful, from the earliest years until this night in Italy, 1996. Safely to presume, that perspective still prevails in 2010 (other evidence is withheld due to the constraint of time).


As RC stated the above with earnestness, the literal waves crashed below us. The hammering sounds and their meanings were not lost to this scribe’s ears or heart. RC had been doing this for years, confronting, answering and staring down thorny, even ugly, and nettlesome issues by pen, national pulpits, graduate level class rooms, and national conferences. As a theological Marine, "fear" and "retreat" were not words in RC's vocabulary. He had been in “harm’s way.” There would be no change in RC’s operational rudder-orders for the future. As in the past with his little known presence in 1974, a theological Ensign, a beginner with pending questions, the older RC had “fleeted up.” By 1996, he was a Fleet Commander--air, surface and subs-- experienced, ready, and able to steam in heavy seas on hard questions.


Thirty-six years later with much water beneath the bridge, RC himself has answered a good many questions. In his early days, this “butter-bar Ensign,” an unknown, a junior with perhaps a future, stood with tested Admirals at the PCRT with all its grand, refulgent and historic context. In those days, he was dwarfed by history and larger names. By 2010, books, articles, conferences, DVD-resources, and radio programs dominate RC’s days. Today, 2010, RC is in his own category. From 1974 to 2010, RC has dramatically shifted from a man dwarfed by context to a man who—himself—is shaping historical context. RC is "what he is," a giant dwarfing others.


RC is a friend, thankfully, but that is a minor matter, albeit an important one personally. Of greater import, RC is arguably one of the great Field Commanders of our time. Amidst changes, one question lingers. Will the Rev. Dr. “RC” Sproul have a place in the history books about 20th -21st century American religion? His inclusion is likely, but newer questions emerge. (This will be for the younger scholars to assess...perhaps in thirty to sixty years.)


As a postscript to the conclusion above, for humor and human interest, RC still retains the charm and eccentricity of Lieutenant Colombo. While many things have changed since 1974, the style persists although it is less pronounced. While older, the RC of 1974 is still the RC of 2010, "tracking to target." Though time and questions haved changed, RC remains a beloved friend, mentor and leader. These conclusions and observations will not change until the death of this scribe. Although separated by 700 miles from RC, the Covenant God of the Veitchs over the generations, "RC" himself, PCRT, and the Confessional contexts live daily with this student--and with my children too. The children grew up on RC.


Thank you, Dr. Sproul, Sir. Apart from His Glorious Majesty, our Sovereign God, Three in One, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, life without you would have been poverty and emptiness. You taught us about the Triune God with all the implications to it--creation, providence, redemption, church life and final things.


A salute is in order. So rendered.


Almighty and everlasting God, from whom cometh every good and perfect gift, we give thee thanks for this faithful servant, teacher, warrior and friend, Dr. Sproul. For his work, books, articles, audio and video resources, we bless thee for thy care in sending RC our way. Set forth, we beseech thee, myriads of teachers like him, veritable Gideonite-warriors. Arise, O LORD, help us, "for the faithful have vanished from among the children of man." (Ps. 12.1). We implore thy blessings on all thy true churches throughout the world in the one, holy, catholic and apostolic doctrine, word, and piety--Confessional Lutherans and Confessional Presbyterians such as Tenth. We ask that thou wouldst redirect Anabaptists, Baptists, TBN-deceivers, revivalists and other enthusiasts back to the truths of the Gospel that that may learn to live in biblical truth, peace, godly concord, and unity with thy Flock, without the arrogant sectarianisms and rootlessnesses. More especially, LORD, deliver us Confessional Anglicans from the Anglican Babylonian Captivity--our invincible sins rise up against us. Thou hast turned thy face from us! Thy judgments are fair, O LORD! They have been long in the making. Have mercy, O God! Have mercy, O Son of God, the Lamb that takest away the sins of the world! Have mercy, O Holy Spirit, we beseech thee. Send down upon our other bishops and other clergy, and upon the congregations committed to their charge, the healthful Spirit of thy grace. Thou alone fightest for us and there is no other; thou rulest the unruly willls of all. Thou along rulest the raging seas. Grant that our leaders may truly please thee, who by thy doctrine and their living, may show forth thy Word and praise. Pour upon them--men like RC and others--the continual dew of thy blessing. Grant this, O Lord, for the honor of our only Advocate and Mediator, Jesus Christ. Amen.