President of Uganda: National Prayer of Repentence in the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit

http://www.newvision.co.ug/news/636533-for-the-sins-of-uganda-i-repent-museveni.html

 

For the sins of Uganda, I repent — Museveni

Publish Date: Oct 18, 2012

 

Christians dedicate Uganda to God during the National Jubilee prayers last week.
 

• 
  
• 
• 
• 

At the National Jubilee Prayers in Namboole, President Yoweri Museveni made history when he openly repented his sins and the sins of Uganda, a move that has excited many religious leaders. Moses Mulondo brings you the prayer verbatim.

 

Father God in heaven, today we stand here as Ugandans, to thank you for Uganda. We are proud that we are Ugandans and Africans. We thank you for all your goodness to us.

 

I stand here today to close the evil past and especially in the last 50 years of our national leadership history and at the threshold of a new dispensation in the life of this nation. I stand here on my own behalf and on behalf of my predecessors to repent. We ask for your forgiveness.
 

We confess these sins, which have greatly hampered our national cohesion and delayed our political, social and economic transformation.
 

 

We confess sins of idolatry and witchcraft which are rampant in our land. We confess sins of shedding innocent blood, sins of political hypocrisy, dishonesty, intrigue and betrayal.
 

Forgive us of sins of pride, tribalism and sectarianism; sins of laziness, indifference and irresponsibility; sins of corruption and bribery that have eroded our national resources; sins of sexual immorality, drunkenness and debauchery; sins of unforgiveness, bitterness, hatred and revenge; sins of injustice, oppression and exploitation; sins of rebellion, insubordination, strife and conflict.

 

These sins and many others have characterised our past leadership, especially the last 50 years of our history. Lord forgive us and give us a new beginning. Give us a heart to love you, to fear you and to seek you. Take away from us all the above sins.
 

We pray for national unity. Unite us as Ugandans and eliminate all forms of conflict, sectarianism and tribalism. Help us to see that we are all your children, children of the same Father. Help us to love and respect one another and to appreciate unity in diversity.

 

We pray for prosperity and transformation. Deliver us from ignorance, poverty and disease. As leaders, give us wisdom to help lead our people into political, social and economic transformation.

 

We want to dedicate this nation to you so that you will be our God and guide. We want Uganda to be known as a nation that fears God and as a nation whose foundations are firmly rooted in righteousness and justice to fulfil what the Bible says in Psalm 33:12: Blessed is the nation, whose God is the Lord. A people you have chosen as your own.

 

I renounce all the evil foundations and covenants that were laid in idolatry and witchcraft. I renounce all the satanic influence on this nation. And I hereby covenant Uganda to you, to walk in your ways and experience all your blessings forever.

 

I pray for all these in the name of the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit. Amen.
 

Religious Leaders React

 

The Church of Uganda Archbishop elect, Stanley Ntagali said the prayer was a step in the right direction. That it was appropriate for the head of state to repent of his sins and the sins of Ugandans.

 

The leader of Pentecostal churches, Apostle Alex Mitala, said the prayer was the beginning of the healing of a nation. “All the nations we read about in the Bible were healed when their leaders repented and acknowledged God’s supremacy,” he said. Mitala urged Ugandans to turn away from their wicked ways.

 

Pastor Dr. Martin Kalibbala of New Testament Covenant Church warned that the fruits of repentance are what matter. “If you repent of stealing, God expects you to immediately stop stealing. If the President’s repentance is genuine, it will be measured on God’s yardstick of bearing the fruits of repentance,” he said.

 

Pastor Dr. Martin Ssempa of Makerere Community Church said it was a good thing for the President to repent on his behalf and on behalf of the nation. He commended those who encouraged and helped the President prepare the prayer, adding that God will answer it.

 

“We hope the President’s repentance will result into greater obedience to God by the executive, which he heads.

 

What’s your view?
 

Mail us on sundayxtra@newvision.co.ug or text us on 8338. Type SUNDAYVISION, leave a space, your message and name and send.

Bp. Mouneer, Diocese of Egypt: Pray for Egypt

http://www.kendallharmon.net/t19/index.php/t19/article/46254/

The Episcopal/Anglican Province of Jerusalem & the Middle East
The Episcopal / Anglican Diocese of Egypt with North Africa and the Horn of Africa

PRAY FOR EGYPT
24 November 2012

Dear friends,

I am so grateful for the messages and assurance of prayers which I have recently received. The situation is not easy, and no-one can predict what is going to happen.

There is obviously agitation within Egypt after President Mursi produced a Constitutional Declaration on Thursday the 22nd of November. This declaration removed the Chief Prosecutor, who was appointed by Mubarak, without consulting the Supreme Judicial Council. Also, the declaration gave absolute power to the President’s decisions. It states that his decisions are "final and unchallengeable by any individual or body until a new constitution has been ratified and a new parliament has been elected.” The Supreme Judicial Council described the declaration as "an unprecedented attack on the independence of the judiciary and its rulings.”

People gathered yesterday (Friday) at Tahrir Square and other places and cities in protest. They called it the ‘Friday of Anger.’ At the same time, Islamists surrounded the Presidential Palace in support of the President. Some clashes happened between the two groups. It is sad to see this division between the Egyptian people. There are people who continue to demonstrate and a major demonstration is planned for Tuesday.
        
A few days ago, the churches in Egypt alongside some liberal parties, withdrew their representatives in the committee responsible for writing the new constitution. This was an act of protest, because the majority of the committee are Islamists who want to impose their own views in the constitution. As we dream for real democracy, it was my hope, with many other Egyptians, to have a constitution that is inclusive of all Egyptians. It is very sad because it is now almost two years since the start of the revolution, and we are still longing for stability, democracy, and the opportunity to rebuild Egypt.
Do pray for Egypt.

May the Lord bless you!

+ Mouneer

R.C. Sproul, Jr. on the Loss of Shannon

http://www.ligonier.org/blog/unbearable-lightness-being-shannon/

The Unbearable Lightness of Being Shannon

 

from R.C. Sproul Jr.Nov 24, 2012Category: Articles

 

It was always my contention, living with a special needs daughter who could be called home at any time, that it was not her health issues that determined when should go, but my spiritual health issues. When each seizure forced me to face her fragility, when each morning I checked first to see if she were breathing before trying to wake her, I comforted myself with this thought- God will not call Shannon home until Shannon is through with me. It was apparent rather early on in her life that she had a peculiar calling, that she was less the child I needed to teach, and more the child that needed to teach me. I was the student, she the master.

My mistake was in thinking that her being done with me and her home going would coincide. She is gone, but she is not done with me. She is still teaching me in her absence. She is teaching me how to deal with pain. Shannon’s seizures were not demure affairs. She fell to the ground. Her legs shook violently. Her upper body jerked back and forth. Her breathing became noisy and labored, and fruitless as her skin would begin to turn blue from lack of oxygen. It might last thirty seconds. It might last ten minutes. When it ended, however, it ended always the same- with deep, unshakable sleep. Immediately after being terrorized by her own body being utterly out of her control, immediately after the electrical waves in her brain became a violent thunderstorm, immediately after not being able to breath, she did not look to me for an explanation. She didn’t look in panic for a place of stability and sanity. Wherever she was, she just slept.

My home was convulsed nearly a year ago when my bride, the love of my life, went on to her reward. It was convulsed again six weeks ago when Shannon went on to join her. And I can’t sleep. For months the routine of caring for my wife was my sanity. For the months after she was gone, the habits of caring for my daughter were my sanity. Now they are both gone. And I have lessons to learn.

For Denise I could be grateful that she went on to a better world, that she would no longer suffer. For Shannon, ironically, I’m not so sure. Oh I am quite confident she is in the arms of her Lord. I’m certain she will have no more seizures. But the thing is, Shannon never felt the weight of her weaknesses. And Shannon had a faith that saw through the veil. She lived on earth as if it were heaven. She was so full of love, joyful, peaceful, so filled with patience and kindness, so good, so faithful, so gentle and so self-controlled that she bloomed, bore fruit in God’s own garden. When she woke up able to walk and speak, when she woke to feel our Lord’s hand on her head, it was no great change for her. She always felt His hand upon her. She always beheld His glory. The gap for Shannon between earth and heaven was just one small, unsteady step.

Which is just the lesson I need to learn. Neither my wife nor my daughter, though they are now a higher order of being, having been glorified, are far from me. My Lord is not with them in some distant dimension. Instead I am there with them, seated with Christ in the heavenly places (Ephesians 2:6). I have been lifted up by His grace. Because He is with me, I make my bed not in Sheol, but in paradise. For wherever He is, there is my treasure. I will lay down and rest, for so He gives His beloved sleep (Psalm 127). And Shannon watches, to see if I breathe, as we both look forward to that day when I finally wake.

I pray you will take the time to watch the sermon I was blessed to preach at Shannon’s memorial service. My hope was to preach the grace of God in her life, and the grace of God through her in my life

---

The Unbearable Lightness of Being Shannon was

originally published at RCSproulJr.com

(Anglican Ink): Gerald Bray: Evangelical supporters of women bishops are "liberals in disguise"

Evangelical supporters of women bishops are "liberals in disguise" | Anglican Ink

Evangelical supporters of women bishops are "liberals in disguise"

Gerald Bray writes about last week's women bishops vote in General Synod

Article | November 24, 2012 - 10:57am | By Gerald Bray

 

A lot of people seem to be confused after the decision by the Church of England's General Synod not to approve the consecration of women as bishops. Let us begin by establishing the facts.

1. All sides agree that the church will have women bishops at some point, whether they like this or not.

2. All sides also agree that provision will have to be made for those who cannot accept women bishops.

The disagreement is not about either of those things but about the nature and extent of the provision to be made. Basically, is it to be decided by the (essentially unsympathetic) majority, which will then impose its solution on a reluctant minority, or will the minority be allowed to determine what it needs in order to feel safe and get the majority to accept that? What has happened so far is that the majority has tried to impose its own will on the minority, which has protested loud and long but been ignored because the majority thought that it was big enough to get its way. This belief has proved to be wrong - hence the lost vote.

Unfortunately, rather than accept that it was wrong and change its approach, the majority has so far retreated into a massive sulk that in some cases has become bitter and hateful towards the minority. If this continues, there will be no solution because the minority will not submit to something that it believes to be unfair.

What we must hope for is a statesmanlike approach from the leaders of the majority who recognize that they have gone wrong, offer the minority most (if not all) of what it wants and accept that compromise, however painful for some, is inevitable. Will this happen? I don't know, but it is surely what all Christians ought to be praying for.

Let me attempt to provide this for those who are not familiar with the English scene or who are out of touch with recent developments.

The General Synod consists of three houses - bishops, clergy and laity. The bishops are there ex officio, so they are the most representative, but since virtually all bishops are from the liberal centre of the church, the conservative wings (Anglo-Catholic and Evangelical) are left out. At the present time there are only two definitely conservative Anglo-Catholic bishops (Chichester and London) and no Evangelicals at all. There have been many protests about this, and even an independent report (known as the Pilling Report after Sir Joseph Pilling who chaired it) that has criticized this situation and called for a remedy, but so far no action has been taken. The bishops have achieved homogeneity but at the cost of credibility - nobody in the conservative parts of the church trusts them.

The house of clergy is elected by the diocesan clergy but it also includes a number of chaplains (university, army etc.) and other oddities. It ought to be the most representative of the houses, and in a way it is, but the trouble with it is that the best clergy tend to be so busy in their parishes (and uninterested in church politics) that they do not stand for election and the places go to politically-minded types who would rather sit on committees than do the work of a minister. As a result, they are a disaster waiting to happen and an embarrassment, especially when they start pronouncing on subjects they know little or nothing about - like theology.

The house of laity consists of lay people elected by the dioceses. The process of election is complicated. Anyone can propose people for election, but the voting list is restricted to those who are already on diocesan and deanery synods. The ordinary people in the pews do not get a vote. As a result, the lay representatives tend to be highly committed individuals with time on their hands - retired people, self-employed people and housewives with tolerant husbands mostly. Some of them are well-educated and among the best synod members, while others hardly know what is going on and tend to respond to emotional appeals of one kind or another.

Back in 1992 the General Synod voted to allow the ordination of women (which began in February 1994) but only by a majority of two votes in the house of laity. The trade-off was that those who could not accept this were protected by an Act of Synod that gave them separate bishops (the so-called Provincial Episcopal Visitors, or 'flying' bishops) who are directly under the two archbishops and who can minister to any parish or clergyman who requests them. It is also possible for ministerial candidates opposed to the ordination of women to be ordained in separate ceremonies.

On the whole, the Act of Synod has worked quite well, but there are problems. Some of those in favour of women clergy and bishops have always resented it and have formed an organization called the Group for Rescinding the Act of Synod (GRAS) which campaigns for all tolerance accorded to the dissenting minority to be struck down.

Needless to say, the very existence of this group is an insult and a threat to those who make use of the flying bishops and the other provisions, and they have probably done more to stiffen opposition to themselves than anything else.

There is also the fact that most bishops and dioceses do not like to be bothered having to make special arrangements for what they see as the awkward minority, and so they put pressure on conservatives to conform for the sake of 'unity'. Those who resist this pressure are marked out for discrimination and some of them have been refused jobs in certain dioceses.

In fairness, I think that the problem is more bureaucratic than theological. Church administrators, including many bishops, have no theology of their own and cannot understand why anyone else does, or at least, why they would let it interfere with the practicalities of everyday life. Making special arrangements for perceived nutters is uncongenial and they try their best not to have to do it.

Another problem is that there are no Evangelical flying bishops. One of the main reasons for that is that back in 1992 the Evangelical bishops of the time all voted for women's ordination and then claimed that it was not an Evangelical issue. In other words, Evangelicals did not care about it one way or the other. Many Evangelical organisations protested and petitioned for Evangelical flying bishops, but they have always been refused.

This is a Catch-22 situation for Evangelicals. Most of them see no reason to desert their current bishops for an Anglo-Catholic one, merely over the women's issue. But if an Evangelical one were to be appointed, they would flock to him in droves - not so much because of the women's thing as because he would be a fellow Evangelical.

What this would mean is that most of the large and wealthy parishes would desert their dioceses, taking their money and resources with them. The bishops know this of course, and so they resist the Evangelical requests for flying bishops of their own. (If there is any still innocent person reading this post, THE CHURCH RUNS ON MONEY ALONE AND HAS DONE SO SINCE JUDAS GOT THOSE 30 PIECES OF SILVER. IT WAS MONEY THAT CRUCIFIED JESUS AND DON'T YOU FORGET IT.)

One side-effect of all this is that whereas twenty or thirty years ago most Evangelical organisations contained a mixture of people for and against women's ordination, battle lines have now hardened. Today, an Evangelical who claims to be an 'egalitarian' in such matters is simply a liberal in disguise.
Anyone who doubts this need only look at the Fulcrum Anglican website. Fulcrum is a tiny pressure group that exists only in the blogosphere but claims to represent the 'Evangelical centre', for which read 'slightly right-wing liberal'. (It is officially against gay marriage but in favour of 'dialogue' - you get the picture.)

Evangelicals cannot be defined by the women's issue, which remains secondary to their chief interests (evangelism, mission, teaching the Bible and other things that the rest of the church only talks about once in a while), but after the most recent events I would be surprised if anyone who supports women bishops would be welcome in most Evangelical circles. As happened before, the extremism of those people is alienating the Evangelical constituency and causing the latter to close ranks against them.

(Guardian): Chinese Calvinism Flourishes

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/andrewbrown/2009/may/27/china-calvin-christianity

Chinese Calvinism flourishes

 

The churches that follow Calvin are the third largest Christian grouping in the world. In China they hope to become the religion of the elite.

 

John Calvin was a Frenchman, but he is being remembered in Geneva this week because it was here that he built Calvinism. Invited to reform the city in 1541, almost as what would now be called a management consultant, he formed an alliance with the city fathers. Over the next 20 years of preaching and pastoring they turned this tiny city, with a population then of only 10,000, into a model of church government and theology which has changed the world.

His followers now form the third-largest Christian grouping in the world. The world alliance of reformed churches claims 75 million members, and while this is a lower headline figure than the Anglican Communion's 80 million, it is not inflated by 25 million nominal Anglicans in Britain.


Although Calvinism is shrinking in western Europe and North America, it is experiencing an extraordinary success in China. I spent some time on Monday talking to the Rev May Tan, from Singapore, where the overseas Chinese community has close links with mainland China. The story she told of the spread of Calvinist religion as an elite religion in China was quite extraordinary. There may be some parallels with the growth of Calvinism in South Korea, where the biggest presbyterian churches in the world are to be found, but it's absolutely unlike the pattern in Africa and Latin America. There, the fastest growing forms of Christianity are pentecostal, and they are spreading among the poor.

But in China neither of those things are to be true.

Calvinists despise pentecostalists. They shudder at unbridled emotion. If they are slain in the spirit, it is with a single, decorous thump: there's to be no rolling afterwards. And in China, the place where Calvinism is spreading fastest is the elite universities, fuelled by prodigies of learning and translation. Wang Xiaochao, a philosopher at one of the Beijing universities, has translated the two major works of St Augustine, the Confessions and the City of God, into Chinese directly from Latin. Gradually all the major works of the first centuries of the Christian tradition are being translated directly from the original languages into Chinese.

All of this is happening outside the control of the official body which is supposed to monitor and supervise the churches in China. Instead, it is the philosophy departments at the universities, or the language departments and the departments of literature and western civilisation that are the channel.

"The [officially recognised] churches are not happy with universities, because it is not within their control. And their seminaries are not at the intellectual level of the universities," says Dr Tan. "Chinese Christianity using Chinese to do Christian thinking has become a very interesting movement."

Many of the missionaries who tried to bring Christianity to China before the communists took over where presbyterians, and other sorts of Calvinist. But that does not explain why Calvinism should be the preferred theology of the house churches and the intellectuals now. Dr Tan suggests that this is because it is Protestant: that is to say it can be made much more convincingly native than Roman Catholicism, since presbyterian congregations choose their own pastors. This is, I suspect, enormously important at a time when China is recovering from a century and a half of being the victim of western powers; the pope's insistence on appointing Catholic bishops is unacceptable to the government and perhaps to the people too.

If she goes to preach at an official church, she says, "There will be perhaps 1000 people and 95% of them are over 65. So it's a sunset church. But if I went to house church – there would be 1000 people; perhaps 20 of them in their 50s, and all the rest are youngsters. The older ones will all be professors at the universities. So these are the future of the churches. They have registered pastors, and no access to seminaries: But they have youth, and future, and money."

Calvinism isn't a religion of subservience to any government. The great national myths of Calvinist cultures are all of wars against imperialist oppressors: the Dutch against the Spanish, the Scots against the English; the Americans against the British. So when the Chinese house churches first emerged from the rubble of the Cultural Revolution in the 80s and 90s "They began to search what theology will support and inform [them]. They read Luther and said, 'not him'. So they read Calvin, and they said 'him, because he has a theology of resistance.' Luther can't teach them or inform them how to deal with a government that is opposition."

And, though the communists stigmatised Christianity as a foreign religion, they also and still more thoroughly smashed up the traditional religions of China: "The communist, socialist critique of traditional religion, and of Confucianism has been effective", she says: "The youngsters think it is very cool to be Christian. Communism has removed all the obstacles for them to come to Christianity."

The most conservative estimates of the new converts to Christianity is 500,000; there is a new church built every month. Calvinist Christianity has a culture of phenomenal industry. Calvin himself, in his time in Geneva, preached every day and twice on Sundays: shorthand writers at the foot of his pulpit took down 108 volumes of his sermons, though most of these have been lost and his reputation rests on the books and pamphlets that he wrote himself. In China now, this kind of Christianity is seen as forward-looking, rational, intellectually serious, and favourable to making money.


"Very soon", said Dr Tan, "Christians will become the majority of university students … that could happen."

It would be astonishing if China were to become a great power in the Christian world, as well as in the economic one. But things just as strange have happened in the past. Who could have foreseen, when Augustine was writing those huge books now translated into Chinese, that barbarous Europe would become the centre of Christian civilisation, and his homeland in North Africa would become entirely Muslim?

Calls to Silence Archbishop Carey | Anglican Ink

Calls to silence Lord Carey | Anglican Ink

Calls to silence Lord Carey

Student Union demands his portrait be removed due to his views on gay marriage

Article | November 22, 2012 - 7:07pm | By George Conger

 

The student union at the former Archbishop of Canterbury's alma mater has begun a petition campaign calling for Kings College London to remove George Carey's portrait from a gallery of famous alumni.


On 26 Oct 2012 the Kings College London Student Union released a statement saying it was offended by Lord Carey’s remarks on marriage in a talk given at a fringe meeting at the Conservative Party Conference. Lord Carey told the meeting at Birmingham Town Hall that re-defining marriage would “strike at the very fabric of society”.

“Let’s have a sensible debate about this, not call people names,” he said on 8 Oct 2012. “Let’s remember that the Jews in Nazi Germany, what started it all against them was when they started being called names. That was the first stage towards that totalitarian state.”

However, the former Archbishop’s restatement of Christian doctrine and teaching on marriage and sexuality was “outdated, hurtful and offensive” the student union said. In the name of “diversity” they demanded he be silenced.

“We are proud of our diverse and inclusive community and would never seek to promote the outright censorship of ideas. But we believe that the images of alumni on the Strand campus are there to represent King’s College London. In light of these comments, we believe by continuing to display an image of Lord Carey, the College are losing sight of the reason why these individuals are displayed on the front of our university,” the statement said.

They called upon the university to be “bold” and make an example of Lord Carey for his remarks which had “exposed our students to a great deal of distress and upset, particularly our LGBT community. Until now, King’s has a proud history of supporting gay students.”

The college administration, however, was not swayed by the pleas to punish Lord Carey. A university spokesman said it would not be removing the portrait. “We explicitly reject the notion of any censorship of ideas. Lord Carey’s views are his own and were offered as part of an open debate,” the spokesman said.

Keeping the archbishop’s photo on display was a mark of the university’s “diverse and inclusive community,” the spokesman added.

Dyson Hague: "Wycliffe: An Historical Study"

Hague, Dyson. Wycliffe: An Historical Study. Toronto: Church Record S.S. Publications, 1924.

It can be accessed and saved as a pdf.file.  http://archive.org/details/wycliffehistoric00haguuoft

Dyson Hague, MA, was the Rector of Memorial Church, London, ONT and Canon of St. Paul’s Cathedral Church, London, ONT.

Here is St. Paul's Cathedral, London, ONT, about 60 miles from the Veitch farm (Great Grandparents, Aliston, ONT...Canadian Anglicans also).  About 120 miles from where your's truly was born.

This little handbook by Dyson Hague is a wonderful little work on Wycliffe.  Clear, succinct, well-researched. 

Wycliffe was and is a man whose thought blows with new freshness on the themes of our time, e.g. the book of Romans for starters...a magisterial Epistle for those for whom, among whom and to whom St. Paul's theology still matters. A necessary epistle for mastery for the young (and the older by way of reminder since they should have already mastered it) Churchmen.

Online Bible Commentaries

http://www.bible-researcher.com/links20.html

---

 Biblical Commentaries Online

Links updated August 2011

The commentaries linked to on this page differ widely in their quality and usefulness for different purposes. Some are of a devotional nature, and are designed to help preachers and intelligent laymen. These usually offer little help on technical questions, but they often prove most helpful in guiding readers in larger questions of interpretation. Others are written from a highly critical perspective, and these are usually of no help in important theological matters, but I include them because they are often most helpful in the difficult and detailed questions about word usage and in their discussions of the cultural background. Then, there are many commentaries by learned conservatives who provide good technical help while remaining true to the Christian faith. Many of the commentaries linked to here are more than a hundred years old, and so it should not be taken for granted that the interpretations they present are in line with twentieth-century scholarship. I hope that the reader will find what is useful in all these books while exercising spiritual discernment. — M.D.M.

Advice and Reviews

·         Spurgeon on Commenting and Commentaries. This essay by Charles Spurgeon will serve as an introduction to several of the commentaries listed below, and as general sound advice to Bible teachers. It is well worth reading. See also the original edition of 1876 "with a catalogue of biblical commentaries and expositions" here.

·         NT Commentaries for Biblical Expositors: 1987-92. By James E. Rosscup, in The Master's Seminary Journal.

·         OT Commentaries for Biblical Expositors: 1987-92. By James E. Rosscup, in The Master's Seminary Journal.

Commentaries on the Whole Bible

·         Calvin's Commentaries. English translation of the famous reformer's commentaries. Also here.

·         Matthew Henry's Commentary. The best resource I know for traditional Protestant interpretation and application. Also here.

·         Poole’s “Annotations” — Annotations Upon the Holy Bible, Wherein the Sacred Text is Inserted, and Various Readings Annex'd … by the Late Reverend and Learned Divine Mr. Matthew Poole (London: Parkhurst, 1700): vol. 1 (Genesis-Isaiah); vol. 2 (Jeremiah-Revelation).

·         Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary. A good concise commentary, much less full than Calvin's or Henry's, but more recent. Also here. Download it in a variety of formats here.

·         John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible. Though dated in some respects, Gill's (strongly Calvinistic) commentary is especially helpful for theological exposition. Also here.

·         Classic Bible Commentaries, courtesy of E-Word Today. Includes commentaries of Gill, Jamieson-Faussett-Brown, John Lightfoot, Ben Johnson, Matthew Henry, McGarvey and Pendleton, and Luther (Galatians). Also the notes of Darby, Wesley, and the Geneva Bible.

·         Coffman's Commentaries. Conservative and devotional commentary on the whole Bible by a Church of Christ scholar, James Burton Coffman. Useful for beginning students, but rather florid in style, and theologically Arminian.

·         Adam Clarke's Commentaries. Conservative and Arminian.

·         Expositions of Holy Scripture by Alexander Maclaren (1908). We might call this a devotional commentary, but it is written on a much higher level than most devotional works. It consists of expository essays on most of the Bible.

·         The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge. Not really a commentary, but a collection of cross-references for every verse of the Bible. Scripture is its own best interpreter!

Commentaries on the Old Testament

·         An Old Testament commentary for English readers, by various writers, edited by Charles J. Ellicott, 5 vols. (London: Cassell, 1882-3): vol. 1; vol. 2; vol 3; vol. 4; vol. 5.

Commentaries on the New Testament

·         Alford’s ‘New Testament for English Readers’ — The New Testament for English Readers: Containing the Authorized Version, with Marginal Corrections of Readings and Renderings, Marginal References, and a Critical and Explanatory Commentary, by Henry Alford, D.D., Dean of Canterbury (London: Rivingtons, 1866; 2nd ed. 1868): Matthew, Mark, Luke (1868, also here and here); John, Acts (1863, also here); Epistles of Paul (1865, also here and here); Hebrews, Catholic Epistles, and Revelation (1866, also here).

·         English edition of Hermann Olshausen's 'Biblical Commentary on the New Testament,' in six volumes: vol. 1, Gospel Harmony (NY 1866. See also editions of 1857, 1861, 1860); vol. 2, Gospel Harmony continued (1866. Se also editions of 1860, 1858); vol. 3, Gospel Harmony continued, Acts, Romans 1-7 (1866. See also edition of 1859); vol. 4, Romans 7–Galatians (1866. See also editions of 1858, 1861); vol. 5, Ephesians–Titus (1866. See also edition of 1858); vol. 6, Timothy–Hebrews (1866. See also edition of 1858).

·         The Expositor's Greek Testament — vol. 1 (Gospels, also here); vol. 2 (Acts, Romans, 1 Corinthians, also here); vol. 3 (2 Corinthians through Colossians, also here); vol. 4 (Thessalonians, Timothy, Titus, Philemon, Hebrews, James, also here); vol. 5 (Epistles of Peter, John, Jude, Revelation, also here and here).

·         A New Testament commentary for English readers, by various writers, edited by Charles J. Ellicott, 3 vols. (London: Cassell, 1884): vol. 1 (Gospels); vol. 2 (Acts, Romans, Corinthians, Galatians); vol. 3 (Ephesians to Revelation).

·         The People's New Testament. A commentary by the Disciples of Christ scholar Barton W. Johnson, first published in 1891. Contains Arminian interpretations, in line with the theology of the American "restoration movement," but otherwise very helpful, with introductions and appendixes. Also here.

·         John Wesley's Notes on the Bible provide a concise commentary from an Arminian perspective, though the doctrines peculiar to Arminianism are not emphasized. The notes for the New Testament were originally published as part of Wesley's New Testament.

·         e-Catena. By Peter Kirby. References to the New Testament culled from the writings of the Ante-Nicene Fathers. Very helpful for students who want to know how the text was interpreted in ancient times.

·         Barnes' Notes on the New Testament. A conservative commentary on the New Testament by an American Presbyterian, Albert Barnes (1832). Also here.

·         Expository Notes. By Thomas L. Constable, Senior Professor of Bible Exposition at Dallas Theological Seminary. PDF files for each book of the Bible, giving much helpful background information.

·         Notes on the Greek New Testament. By Peter Misselbrook. Brief commentary on all the books of the New Testament designed for students who have some Greek. Consists mostly of quotations drawn from recent commentaries by conservative scholars.

·         Word Studies in the New Testament by Marvin Vincent. A very useful resource for teachers. Vincent goes through the entire New Testament briefly noting interesting details about words and phrases. First published in 1886.

·         Word Pictures in the New Testament by A.T. Robertson. Similar to Vincent's earlier work, but more up to date in scholarship and more technical. First published in 1933. Also available in smaller (and advertising-heavy) files here.

·         IVP New Testament Commentaries at Bible Gateway. A collection of brief and casual commentaries from a moderately conservative perspective, recently published by InterVarsity Press. Currently available online are: Matthew (Craig S. Keener); Luke (Darrell L. Bock); John (Rodney A. Whitacre); Acts (William J. Larkin); 2 Cor (Linda L. Belleville); Galatians (G. Walter Hansen); Philippians (Gordon D. Fee); Colossains (Robert W. Wall); 1 Tim (Philip H. Towner); Philemon (Robert W. Wall); Titus (Philip H. Towner); James (George M. Stulac); 1,2,3 John (Marianne Meye Thompson); and Revelation (J. Ramsey Michaels).

·         John Lightfoot's Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica. Notices many parallels in early Jewish writings that help to explain the New Testament. Also here.

·         Bengel’s ‘Gnomon of the New Testament’

o    Original Latin — Johann Albrecht Bengel, D. Joh. Alberti Bengelii Gnomon Novi Testamenti. Third edition, edited by Ernest Bengel and Johann Steudel (London: Williams and Norgate, 1862).

o    Unabridged English translation by Fausset, Bandinel, Bryce and Fletcher (Edinburgh, 1858) in five volumes:

§  vol. 1 (Matthew—Mark, also here, here and here);

§  vol. 2 (Luke—Acts, also here, here and here);

§  vol. 3 (Romans—2 Corinthians, also here and here);

§  vol. 4 (Galatians—Hebrews, also here);

§  vol. 5 (James—Revelation, also here and here).

o    Abridged translation with notes by Lewis and Vincent (Philadelphia, 1864): vol. 1 (Gospels and Acts); vol. 2 (Romans to Revelation).

·         A Popular Commentary on the New Testament, by English and American Scholars of Various Evangelical Denominations, with Illustrations and Maps, edited by Philip Schaff (also called "The International Illustrated Commentary on the New Testament") :— vol. 1, Introduction, and the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke (1879, also here); vol. 2, Gospel of John and Acts (1880, also here); vol. 3, Epistles of Paul (1882, also here); vol. 4, Catholic Epistles and Revelation (1883, also here).

·         Doddridge’s Family Expositor, in 6 volumes (1807 reprint): vol. 1 (first part of Gospel harmony); vol. 2 (second part of Gospel harmony); vol. 3 (Acts, also here); vol. 4 (Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, also here); vol. 5 (Galatians to Philemon); vol. 6 (Hebrews to Revelation, also here).

·         Trollope's Analecta Theologica — Analecta Theologica: A Critical, Philological, and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament, Adapted to the Greek Text, Compiled and Digested from the Most Approved Sources, British and Foreign ... by William Trollope. In two volumes. (London: T. Cadell, 1st ed. 1830 and 1835, 2nd ed. 1842): vol. 1 of the 1st ed.; vol. 2 of the 1st ed.; vol. 1 of the 2nd ed.; vol. 2 of the 2nd ed.

·         The expository writings of Frederic W. Farrar: The Life of Christ, vol. 1 and vol. 2 (1874, also in one volume here); The Life and Work of St. Paul , vol. 1 and vol. 2 (1879, also in one volume here); The Early Days of Christianity, vol. 1 and vol. 2 (1882, also in one volume here). These volumes amount to a commentary on the whole New Testament.

Commentaries on Individual Books and Groups of Books

For commentary on each book see also "Commentaries on the Whole Bible," "Commentaries on the Old Testament" and "Commentaries on the New Testament" above.

Genesis

·         Calvin on Genesis:chaps. 1-23,chaps. 24-50.

·         Keil on Genesis.

·         Skinner on Genesis (also here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Genesis and Exodus, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1871)

·         James G. Murphy on Genesis (1863)

·         Lange on Genesis, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Driver on Genesis: 4th edition (1905), 10th edition (1910), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

Exodus

·         Calvin's 'Harmony of the Law':vol. 1,vol. 2,vol. 3,vol. 4.

·         Keil on Exodus: 1-11, 12-40.

·         Genesis and Exodus, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1871)

·         Lange on Exodus, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

·         NcNeile on Exodus (1908, also here and here), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

Leviticus

·         Calvin's 'Harmony of the Law':vol. 1,vol. 2,vol. 3,vol. 4.

·         Keil on Leviticus.

·         Gardiner on Leviticus, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

·         See also under Commentaries on the Whole Bible and Commentaries on the Old Testament above.

Numbers

·         Keil on Numbers.

·         Lange on Numbers, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Gray on Numbers, from the International Critical Commentary series

Deuteronomy

·         Calvin's 'Harmony of the Law':vol. 1,vol. 2,vol. 3,vol. 4.

·         Keil on Deuteronomy.

·         Driver on Deuteronomy (1903, also at the Internet Archive here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Schröeder on Deuteronomy, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

Joshua

·         Keil on Joshua. Also at Google Books here.

·         Calvin on Joshua.

·         Maclear on Joshua (1897), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Joshua to I Kings (also here), from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1872)

·         Fay on Joshua, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

Judges

·         Keil on Judges. Also at Google Books here.

·         Lias on Judges (1896), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Moore on Judges (1895, 1910, also at the Internet Archive here, here, and here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Joshua to I Kings (also here), from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1872)

·         Cassel on Judges, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

Ruth

·         Keil on Ruth. Also at Google Books here.

·         Joshua to I Kings (also here), from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1872)

·         Cassel on Ruth, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

1 and 2 Samuel

·         Keil on the Books of Samuel. Also at Google Books here.

·         Smith on 1 and 2 Samuel (1899, 1902; also at the Internet Archive here, here, and here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Joshua to I Kings (also here), from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1872)

·         Kirkpatrick on 2nd Samuel (1890), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Erdmann on First and Second Samuel, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

1 and 2 Kings

·         Keil on the Books of the Kings. Also at Google Books here.

·         Montgomery on Kings, from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Joshua to I Kings (also here), from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1872)

·         II Kings to Esther, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1873)

·         Lumby on 1st Kings (1886), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Lumby on 2nd Kings (1891), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Bähr on First and Second Kings, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

1 and 2 Chronicles

·         Keil on 1 and 2 Chronicles.

·         Curtis on Chronicles (also here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         II Kings to Esther, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1873)

·         Barnes on 1st and 2nd Chronicles (1899), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Zöckler on First and Second Chronicles, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

Ezra and Nehemiah

·         Keil on Ezra and Nehemiah.

·         Batten on Ezra and Nehemiah, from the International Critical Commentary series

·         II Kings to Esther, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1873)

·         Schulz on Ezra, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Crosby on Nehemiah, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

Esther

·         Keil on Esther.

·         Paton on Esther (1908, also at the Internet Archive here, here, and here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         II Kings to Esther, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1873)

·         Schultz on Esther, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

Job

·         Delitzsch on Job: 1-22, 23-42.

·         Driver on Job (also here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon (also here), from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1873)

·         Davidson on Job (1884), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Gibson on Job, 2nd ed. (1905), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

·         Zöckler on Job, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

Psalms

·         Joseph Addison Alexander’s The Psalms Translated and Explained (1850): vol. 1 (1-50, also here), vol. 2 (51-100, also here), vol. 3 (101-150, also here).

·         Delitzsch on the Psalms: 1-35, 36-83, 84-150.

·         The Student's Handbook to the Psalms, by John Sharpe (London, 1894). Excellent conservative introduction to the Psalms.

·         A Commentary on the Psalms: from Primitive and Mediaeval writers, and from the Various Office-books and Hymns of the Roman, Mozarabic, Ambrosian, Gallican, Greek, Coptic, Armenian, and Syrian rites ... by the Rev. J.M. Neale and the Rev. R.F. Littledale (London, 1869-74): vol. 1; vol. 2; vol. 3; vol. 4.

·         The Treasury of the Psalter: an Aid to the Better Understanding of the Psalms in their Use in Public and Private Devotions ... Compiled by George Putnam Huntington and Henry Aiken Metcalf. 4th ed. (New York, 1899).

·         Alexander Maclaren on the Psalms (from the Expositor's Bble series): vol. 1; vol. 2; vol. 3.

·         Augustine on the Psalms — Expositions on the Book of Psalms, by S. Augustine, Bishop of Hippo, Translated, with Notes and Indices, in six volumes (Oxford, 1847-57) translated by E.B. Pusey, H. Walford, and Charles Marriott: vol. 1, Psa. 1-36 (also here); vol. 2, Psa. 37-52; vol. 3, Psa. 53-75; vol. 4, Psa. 76-101; vol. 5, Psa. 102-125; vol. 6, Psa. 126-150. See also the abridgment published in vol. 8 of the series A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers (also here). Students should be aware that Augustine's Psalter is the old Latin version based on the Septuagint.

·         Calvin on the Psalms:1-35,36-66,67-92,93-119,119-150.

·         A Commentary on the Psalms: from Primitive and Mediaeval writers and from the various Office-books and Hymns of the Roman, Mozarabic, Ambrosian, Gallican, Greek, Coptic, Armenian, and Syrian rites .. by the Rev. J.M. Neale and the Rev. R.F. Littledale (London, 1869-74). In four volumes: vol. 1; vol. 2; vol. 3; vol. 4.

·         The Treasury of the Psalter: an Aid to the Better Understanding of the Psalms in their use in Public and Private Devotions ... Compiled by George Putnam Huntington and Henry Aiken Metcalf. 4th ed. (New York, 1899).

·         Alexander Maclaren on the Psalms (Expositor's Bble): vol. 1; vol. 2; vol. 3.

·         George Phillips, A Commentary on the Psalms, Designed Chiefly for the Use of Hebrew Students and of Clergymen (London, 1872): vol. 1; vol. 2.

·         Kirkpatrick on Psalms (1906) Cf. also the separate volumes Psalms 1-41 (1901), Psalms 42-89 (1900, also here), Psalms 90-150 (1903, also here), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Briggs on the Psalms: vol. 1 (1-50, also here), vol. 2 (51-150), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon (also here), from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1873)

·         Moll on the Psalms, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

Proverbs

·         Delitzsch on the Proverbs: 1-17, 18-31.

·         Perowne on Proverbs (1899), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Toy on Proverbs (also at the Internet Achive here, here and here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon (also here), from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1873)

·         Commentary on Proverbs by William Deane, Stephen Taylor-Taswell and Walter Adeney, from the Pulpit Commentary Series edited by H. D. M. Spence (1891).

·         Zöckler on Proverbs, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

·         Commentaries and articles on the Proverbs compiled by Dr. Ted Hildebrandt of Gordon College.

Ecclesiastes

·         Delitzsch on Ecclesiastes.

·         Plumptre on Ecclesiastes (1888), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Barton on Ecclesiastes (1908, also here, and at the Internet Archive here and here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon (also here), from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1873)

·         Zöckler on Ecclesiates, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

Song of Solomon

·         Delitzsch on Song of Songs.

·         Harper on the Song of Solomon (1902), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon (also here), from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1873)

·         Zöckler on the Song of Solomon, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

Isaiah

·         Calvin on Isaiah:1-16,17-32,33-48,49-66.

·         Delitzsch on Isaiah: 1-27, 28-66.

·         Lowth on Isaiah. Isaiah: A New Translation, with a Preliminary Dissertation, and Notes, Critical, Philological, and Explanatory, by Robert Lowth, D.D., etc. From the tenth English edition (Boston, 1834). Also here, here, here, and here.

·         Delitzsch on Isaiah — Franz Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Prophecies of Isaiah, trans. by James Martin. 2 vols. (1873): vol. 1; vol. 2.

·         Gray on Isaiah: vol. 1 (1-39, also here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1875)

·         Skinner on Isaiah, chaps. 1-39 (1897), chaps. 40-66 (1898), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         T.K. Cheyne on Isaiah: The Prophecies of Isaiah. A New Translation with Commentary and Appendices (London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co., 1880, 81), in two volumes: vol. 1; vol. 2.

·         Wade on Isaiah (1911), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

·         Von Orelli on Isaiah, translated by J.S. Banks

·         Nägelsbach on Isaiah, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

·         Matthew Arnold’s revision of Isaiah: Isaiah of Jerusalem, in the Authorised English Version, with an Introduction, Corrections, and Notes (London: Macmillan and Co., 1883, containing chapters 1-39); Isaiah XL-LXVI with the Shorter Prophecies Allied to It, Arranged and Edited with Notes (London: MacMillan and Co., 1875). Also online is the earlier edition, The Great Prophecy of Israel's Restoration (Isaiah, Chapters 40-66) Arranged and Edited for Young Learners (London: Macmillan and Co., 1872).

Jeremiah and Lamentations

·         Calvin on Jeremiah and Lamentations:1-9,10-19,20-29,30-47,48-52.

·         Keil on Jeremiah — The Prophecies of Jeremiah and Lamentations, by C.F. Keil, translated from the German by David Patrick and James Kennedy (Edinburgh, 1880), vol. 1 (1-29), vol. 2 (30-52, and Lamentations)

·         Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1875)

·         Elliott-Binns on Jeremiah (1919), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

·         Nägelsbach on Jeremiah and Lamentations, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

Ezekiel

·         Calvin on Ezekiel:1-12,13-20.

·         Keil on Ezekiel: 1-28, 29-48.

·         Davidson on Ezekiel (1893), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Ezekiel, Daniel, and the Minor Prophets, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1876)

·         Redpath on Ezekiel (1907), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

·         Fairbairn on Ezekiel (2nd ed., 1855. Also here)

·         Schröder on Ezekiel, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here and here.

Daniel

·         Calvin on Daniel:1-6,7-12.

·         Keil on Daniel.

·         Montgomery on Daniel, from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Ezekiel, Daniel, and the Minor Prophets, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1876)

·         Driver on Daniel (1900), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Zöckler on Daniel, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here and here.

The Minor Prophets

·         John Calvin on Hosea;Joel, Amos, Obadiah;Jonah, Micah, Nahum;Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai;Zechariah and Malachi.

·         Edghill on Amos (1914), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

·         Wade on Micah, Micah, Obadiah, Joel, and Jonah (1925), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

·         Cheyne on Hosea (1884), from the Cambridge Bible series. Also here.

·         Driver on Joel and Amos (1898), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Perowne on Obadiah and Jonah (1889), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Cheyne on Micah (1882), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Davidson on Nahum, Habakkuk and Zephaniah (1896), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Perowne on Haggai and Zechariah (1890), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Ezekiel, Daniel, and the Minor Prophets, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1876)

·         The Minor Prophets: A Commentary Explanatory and Practical. By Edward B. Pusey. Conservative and devotional in tone, but with good scholarly substance.

·         Harper on Amos and Hosea (1905, also at the Internet Archive here and here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Kleinert, Schmoller, Chambers, Elliot, McCurdy and Packard on the Minor Prophets, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

·         Smith on Micah, Zephaniah and Nahum, Ward on Habakkuk, and Bewer on Obadiah and Joel (also here and here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Mitchell on Haggai and Zechariah, Smith on Malachi, and Bewer on Jonah (also here and here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Keil on Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah and Micah.

·         Keil on Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi.

The Gospels

·         Catena Aurea: Commentary on the Four Gospels Collected out of the Works of the Fathers by Thomas Aquinas (Oxford: Parker, 1841): Matthew 1-10; Matthew 11-21; Matthew 22-28; Mark; Luke 1-10; Luke 11-24; John 1-10; John 11-21. See also the transcription of this work at the Veritas Bible website.

·         Calvin on the Synoptic Gospels:vol. 1,vol. 2,vol. 3.

·         The Expositor's Greek Testament, vol. 1 (1902).

·         George Campbell's ‘Four Gospels’ — George Campbell, The Four Gospels, Translated from the Greek, with Preliminary Dissertations, and Notes Critical and Explanatory. 4 vols. (Boston: W. Wells, 1811): Vol. 1 (dissertations, also here); Vol. 2 (more dissertations); Vol. 3 (translations of the Gospels); Vol. 4 (critical and philological notes, also here). See also the same work reprinted in two volumes of The Works of George Campbell in Six Volumes (London: Tegg, 1840), volume one and two. Also available online is the edition printed in Andover by Gould and Newman (1837), Vol. 1 (containing the dissertations and Matthew, also here); Vol. 2 (Mark, Luke and John, also here). But this Andover edition has many errors.

Matthew

·         Chrysostom on Matthew

·         Calvin on the Synoptic Gospels:vol. 1,vol. 2,vol. 3.

·         Carr on Matthew (1893), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Heinrich A. W. Meyer on Matthew

·         Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew, by Dr. Gijs van den Brink (1997). A good conservative and up-to-date commentary, based on the NIV.

·         A.T. Robertson on Matthew — A. T. Robertson, Commentary on the Gospel According to Matthew (1911). Also here.

·         Plummer on Matthew — An Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to S. Matthew by Alfred Plummer (London: Elliot Stock, 1910).

·         Allen on Matthew (1907, also at the Internet Archive here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Mathew, Mark, Luke, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1878)

·         Alexander Maclaren on the Gospel of Matthew (1892), from the Expositor's Bible series, in two volumes: vol. 1 and vol. 2

·         Lange on Matthew, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. See also the original German work here.

Mark

·         Calvin on the Synoptic Gospels:vol. 1,vol. 2,vol. 3.

·         Rowlandson on Mark (1869, also here). Very conservative.

·         Maclear on Mark (1893), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Gould on Mark (1896, also at the Internet Archive here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Heinrich A. W. Meyer on Mark and Luke

·         Mathew, Mark, Luke, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1878)

·         W.C. Allen on Mark (1915).

·         Lange on Mark, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. See also the original German work here.

Luke

·         Calvin on the Synoptic Gospels:vol. 1,vol. 2,vol. 3.

·         Farrar on Luke (1891), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Godet's Commentary on Luke — Frederic Louis Godet, A Commentary on the Gospel of St. Luke By F. Godet, translated from the second french edition by E. W. Shalders and M.D. Cusin (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1875); vol.1 (also here); vol. 2.

·         Plummer on Luke (6th ed., 1903, also at the Internet Archive here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Heinrich A. W. Meyer on Mark and Luke

·         Mathew, Mark, Luke, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1878)

·         Oosterzee on Luke, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Ragg on Luke (1922, also here), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

·         Here I would also list Spencer C. Carpenter’s excellent book Christianity according to S. Luke (London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1919), although it is not a commentary, but a topical treatment of the Gospel.

John

·         Chrysostom on John (also here).

·         Calvin on John:1-11,12-21.

·         Heinrich A. W. Meyer on John

·         Plummer on John (1902), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         John and Acts (also here), from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1880)

·         Westcott on John's Gospel (1882), reprinted from the 'Speaker's Commentary,' with minor revisions. See also the posthumous edition with Greek text and final revisions (1908): volume 1; volume 2.

·         Lange on John, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here. See also the original German work here.

The Acts

·         Chrysostom on the Acts of the Apostles

·         Calvin on Acts:1-13,14-28.

·         A Commentary on the Original Text of the Acts of the Apostles, by Horatio B. Hackett (Boston: John P. Jewett and Co., 1852). second edition, 1858.

·         Peloubet on Acts — The Teachers' Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, by Francis N. Peloubet (Oxford, 1901).

·         Gloag on Acts: vol. 1, vol. 2, from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Heinrich A. W. Meyer on the Acts

·         John and Acts (also here), from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1880)

·         Lumby on Acts (1891), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Lechler on the Acts of the Apostles, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

The Epistles of Paul

·         The Life and Epistles of St. Paul, by W.J. Conybeare and J.S. Howson, 7th edition (New York, 1864): vol. 1; vol 2.

·         Romans to Philemon, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1881)

·         Commentary on Thessalonians, Corinthians, Galatians and Romans, by J. W. McGarvey and Philip Y. Pendleton (1916).

·         The Epistles of St. Paul to the Thessalonians, Galatians and Romans, Translation and Commentary by the late Benjamin Jowett, M.A. 3rd edition, edited and condensed by Lewis Campbell (London: John Murray, 1894). Facsimile PDF format.

·         John Locke's Paraphrase and Commentary on the Epistles of St. Paul — A Paraphrase and Notes on the Epistles of St. Paul to the Galatians, First and Second Corinthians, Romans, and Ephesians, to which is prefixed an Essay for the Understanding of St. Paul's Epistles, in vol. 8 of The Works of John Locke. A New Edition, Corrected (London: Thomas Tegg, 1823). Also in a reprint (Boston: Hilliard, Gray and Co. , 1832) here. First published in parts, beginning in 1705.

·         The Expositor's Greek Testament — vol. 2 (Romans and 1 Corinthians); vol. 3 (2 Cor., Gal., Eph., Phil., Col.); vol. 4 (1 and 2 Thess., 1 and 2 Tim., Titus, Philemon, Hebrews).

·         Macknight on the Epistles. — A New Literal Translation, from the Original Greek, of all the Apostolical Epistles, with a Commentary, and Notes, Philological, Critical, Explanatory, and Practical. To which is added, A History of the Life of the Apostle Paul. By James Macknight, D.D. In Six Volumes (London, 1806; Boston, 1810): vol. 1 (Preliminary Essays and Romans, also here); vol. 2 (1 and 2 Corinthians, also here and here); vol. 3 (Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, also here and here); vol. 4 (1 and 2 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, and Philemon, also here); vol. 5 (Hebrews, James, 1 and 2 Peter, also here) vol. 6 (Epistles of John and Jude, and supplementary essays, also here and here). See also the one volume editions (hard to read) of 1835 and 1841.

Romans

·         Chrysostom on the Epistle to the Romans

·         Calvin on Romans.

·         Hermann Olshausen on Romans (Edinburgh, 1854)

·         Robert Haldane on Romans — Exposition of the Epistle to the Romans, 9th ed. (Edinburgh: William Oliphant, 1874).

·         Hodge on Romans— Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans by Charles Hodge, New Edition (Philadelphia: Martien, 1864).

·         Moule on Romans (1891), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Heinrich A. W. Meyer on Romans

·         Sanday and Headlam on Romans (1895, 7th ed. 1902, ninth ed. 1904, 10th ed. 1905). Also at the Internet Archive here, from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Romans Verse-by-Verse, by William R. Newell (Moody Press, 1938). A good solid commentary for laymen, by a famous teacher at Moody Bible Institute.

·         Godet's Commentary on Romans — Frederic Louis Godet, Commentary on St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans, by F. Godet, translated from the French by Rev. A. Cusin, the translation revised and edited with an Introduction and Appendix by Talbot W. Chambers (New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1883).

·         Fay on Romans, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

Corinthians

·         Chrysostom on First Corinthians

·         Chrysostom on Second Corinthians

·         Calvin on Corinthians:1 Cor. 1-14,1 Cor. 15-16,2 Corinthians.

·         Heinrich A. W. Meyer on 1st and 2nd Corinthians

·         Lias on 1st Corinthians (1896), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Lias on 2nd Corinthians (1897), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Robertson on 1 Corinthians, from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Plummer on 2 Corinthians (1915, also here, and at the Internet Archive here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         An Exposition of the First Epistle to the Corinthians, by Charles Hodge (1860). Also at Google Books here.

·         An Exposition of the Second Epistle to the Corinthians, by Charles Hodge (1862).

·         Edwards on 1st Corinthians. A Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians, by Thomas Charles Edwards (1886).

·         Marcus Dods on 1st Corinthians, from the Expositor's Bble (1891)

·         Kling on First Corinthians, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

·         Kling on Second Corinthians, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

·         James Moffatt on First Corinthians.

Galatians

·         Chrysostom on Galatians

·         Calvin on Galatians and Ephesians.

·         Charles J. Ellicott on Galatians (1854), 2nd ed. (1859, also here), 3rd ed. (1863, also at the Internet Archive here)

·         Heinrich A. W. Meyer on Galatians

·         Perowne on Galatians (1896), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Burton on Galatians (1920, also at the Internet Archive here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         J.B. Lightfoot on Galatians — Saint Paul's Epistle to the Galatians; A Revised Text with Introductions, Notes, and Dissertations by Joseph Barber Lightfoot; 1st ed. (London: MacMillan, 1865); 2nd ed. (1866); 3rd ed. (1869); 4th ed. (1874, also here).

·         G.G. Findlay on Galatians, from the Expositor's Bible (1891)

·         Schmoller on Galatians, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Robinson on Galatians (1899), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

Ephesians and Colossians

·         Chrysostom on Ephesians

·         Chrysostom on Colossians

·         Calvin on Galatians and Ephesians.

·         Calvin on Philippians, Colossians, Thessalonians.

·         Charles Hodge on Ephesians (1860).

·         Moule on Ephesians (1891), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Heinrich A. W. Meyer on Ephesians

·         Heinrich A. W. Meyer on Colossians

·         Abbott on Ephesians and Colossians (1897, 1903, also at the Internet Archive here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         J.B. Lightfoot on Colossians and Philemon — St. Paul's Epistles to the Colossians & to Philemon: A Revised Text with Introduction and Notes by Joseph Barber Lightfoot, 2nd ed. (1876).

·         Moule on Colossians and Philemon (1898), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Charles J. Ellicott on Ephesians (3rd. ed., 1864), 4th ed. (1868)

·         Charles J. Ellicott on Philippians, Colossians, and Philemon (3rd. ed., 1865)

·         Braune on Ephesians, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. See also the original German work here.

·         Braune on Colossians, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. See also the original German work here.

·         Westcott on Ephesians (posthumous, edited by J.M. Schulhof, 1906).

·         J. Armitage Robinson on Ephesians (1907).

Philippians

·         Chrysostom on Philippians

·         Calvin on Philippians, Colossians, Thessalonians.

·         Moule on Philippians (1893), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Vincent on Philippians and Philemon (1897, also at the Internet Archive here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Eadie's commentary on Philippians — John Eadie, A Commentary on the Greek Text of the Epistle of Paul to the Philippians (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1869). Second edition, edited by W. Young (1884).

·         J.B. Lightfoot on Philippians — St. Paul's Epistle to the Philippians: A Revised Text with Introduction and Notes by Joseph Barber Lightfoot, 3rd ed. (1873, also here).

·         C.J. Vaughan on Philippians — St. Paul's Epistle to the Philippians, with Translation, Paraphrase, and Notes, for English Readers, by Charles John Vaughan (London: MacMillan, 1885).

·         Jones on Philippians (1918), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

·         Charles J. Ellicott on Philippians, Colossians, and Philemon (3rd. ed., 1865)

·         Braune on Philippians, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. See also the original German work here.

·         H.A.W. Meyer on Philippians.

Thessalonians

·         Chrysostom on 1 Thessalonians

·         Chrysostom on 2 Thessalonians

·         Calvin on Philippians, Colossians, Thessalonians.

·         Charles J. Ellicott on 1 and 2 Thessalonians (1858), 4th ed. (1880)

·         Findlay on 1st and 2nd Thessalonians (1898), from the Cambridge Bible series. Also here.

·         Frame on 1st and 2nd Thessalonians (1912, also at the Internet Archive here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         George Milligan on 1st and 2nd Thessalonians (1908).

·         Auberlen and Riggenbach on First and Second Thessalonians, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Lünemann on the epistles to the Thessalonians, from Meyer’s NT commentary series.

The Pastoral Epistles

·         Chrysostom on 1 Timothy

·         Chrysostom on 2 Timothy

·         Chrysostom on Titus

·         Calvin on Timothy, Titus, Philemon.

·         Charles J. Ellicott on the Pastoral Epistles (1856)

·         Humphreys on 1st and 2nd Timothy and Titus (1895), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Lock on the Patoral Epistles, from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Bernard on the Pastoral Epistles— The Pastoral Epistles, edited with and Introduction and Notes, by John H. Bernard (Cambridge, 1906).

·         E.F. Brown on the Pastoral Epistles (1917), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

·         Oosterzee on First and Second Timothy, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Oosterzee on Titus, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Huther on 1st and 2nd Timothy and Titus, from the English translation of Meyer’s NT commentary series.

Philemon

·         Chrysostom on Philemon

·         Calvin on Timothy, Titus, Philemon.

·         J.B. Lightfoot on Colossians and Philemon — St. Paul's Epistles to the Colossians & to Philemon: A Revised Text with Introduction and Notes by Joseph Barber Lightfoot, 2nd ed. (1876).

·         Moule on Colossians and Philemon (1898), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Vincent on Philippians and Philemon (1897, also at the Internet Archive here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Charles J. Ellicott on Philippians, Colossians, and Philemon (3rd. ed., 1865)

·         Oosterzee on Philemon, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Meyer on Philemon.

Hebrews

·         Chrysostom on Hebrews

·         Calvin on Hebrews.

·         John Owen’s Exposition of the Epistle to the Hebrews with Preliminary Exercitations, abridged by Edward Williams, in four volumes: vol. 1; vol. 2; vol. 3; vol. 4.

·         Farrar on Hebrews (1891, also here), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Moll on Hebrews, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Moffatt on Hebrews, from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Wickham on Hebrews (1922), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

·         Lünemann on Hebrews, from the English translation of Meyer’s NT commentary series.

The Catholic Epistles

·         Calvin on the Catholic Epistles.

·         Hebrews to Revelation, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1881)

·         Huther on the epistles of James, Peter, John and Jude, from Meyer’s NT commentary series.

Epistle of James

·         Knowling on James (1922), from the ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series

·         Ropes on James (1916, also at the Internet Archive here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Plumptre on James (1890), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Oosterzee on James, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Huther on James, from Meyer’s NT commentary series.

Epistles of Peter and Jude

·         Mayor on Jude and 2 Peter — The Epistle of St. Jude and the Second Epistle of St. Peter; Greek Text with Introduction, Notes, and Comments, by Joseph B. Mayor (London: Macmillan, 1907).

·         Bigg on the Epistles of Peter and Jude (1903, also here, and at the Internet Archive here), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Plumptre on 1st and 2nd Peter and Jude (1890), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Fronmüller on the Epistles of Peter, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Fronmüller on the Epistle of Jude, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Huther on the Epistles of Peter, from Meyer’s NT commentary series.

·         Huther on the Epistle of Jude, from Meyer’s NT commentary series.

Epistles of John

·         Brooke on the Epistles of John, from the International Critical Commentary series. Also at Google Books here.

·         Plummer on the Epistles of John (1889, cf. also the revised edition of 1896), from the Cambridge Bible series

·         Westcott on the Epistles of John (1886; also online is the first edition of 1883 here and here.)

·         Braune on the Epistles of John, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series.

·         Huther on the Epistles of John, from Meyer’s NT commentary series.

Revelation of John

·         E.W. Hengstenberg on the Revelation of John, translated by Patrick Fairbairn: vol. 1 and vol. 2.

·         Simcox on the Revelation of John (1894), from the Cambridge Bible series. Also here.

·         Charles on Revelation, vol. 1 (also at the Internet Archive), vol. 2 (also at the Internet Archive, 1920), from the International Critical Commentary series

·         Hebrews to Revelation, from the “Speaker's Commentary” (1881)

·         William Milligan on the Book of Revelation, from the Expositor's Bible (1893)

·         Lange on the Revelation of John, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

·         Düsterdieck on the Revelation of John, from Meyer’s NT commentary series.

Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books

·         Bissell on the Apocryphal Books, from the English edition of Lange's Commentary series. Also here.

·         Apocrypha, vol. 1, from the “Speaker's Commentary,” edited by Henry Wace (1888)

·         Apocrypha, vol. 2 (also here), from the “Speaker's Commentary,” edited by Henry Wace (1888)

·         The Book of Wisdom by William J. Deane (London, 1881).

·         The Wisdom of Solomon, in the Revised Version with Notes, by the Rev. J.A.F. Gregg (Cambridge, 1909).

Commentaries Grouped by Series

·         Commentaries on the Old Testament by Keil and Delitzsch. A conservative and very scholarly series originally published in German, and translated into English during the nineteenth century: Genesis;Exodus 1-11;Exodus 12-40;Leviticus;Numbers;Deuteronomy;Joshua;Judges;Ruth;1 and 2 Samuel;1 and 2 Kings;1 and 2 Chronicles;Ezra;Nehemiah;Esther;Job 1-22;Job 23-42;Psalms 1-35;Psalms 36-83;Psalms 84-150;Proverbs 1-17;Proverbs 18-31;Song of Songs;Ecclesiastes;Isaiah 1-27; Isaiah 28-66;Jeremiah 1-29;Jeremiah 30-52 and Lamentations;Ezekiel 1-28;Ezekiel 29-48;Daniel;Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah and Micah;Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi.

·         English translation of the NT commentary series edited by Heinrich A. W. Meyer: on Matthew;Mark and Luke;John;Acts;Romans;1st and 2nd Corinthians;Galatians;Ephesians;Philippians;Colossians;1 and 2 Thessalonians;1 and 2 Timothy, Titus;Philemon;Hebrews;James;1 and 2 Peter;Epistles of John;Jude;Revelation. These are English translations of the commentaries published in the Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament series begun by Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer in 1832 and completed in 1859 with the assistance of J.E. Huther, Friedrich Düsterdieck and G.K.G. Lünemann. The series represents a moderately conservative approach, and is augmented by notes added by American editors of the English translations. The volumes are also available, in both English and German, at the Internet Archive site.

·         The International Critical Commentary. This series is quite liberal and higher-critical in outlook, but very useful for philological, text-critical, and historical background information. — Skinner on Genesis (also here); Gray on Numbers; Driver on Deuteronomy (1903, also at the Internet Archive here); Moore on Judges (1895, 1910, also at the Internet Archive here, here, and here); Smith on 1 and 2 Samuel (1899, 1902; also at the Internet Archive here, here, and here); Montgomery on Kings; Curtis on Chronicles (also here); Batten on Ezra and Nehemiah; Paton on Esther (1908, also at the Internet Archive here, here, and here); Driver on Job (also here); Briggs on the Psalms: vol. 1 (1-50, also here), vol. 2 (51-150); Toy on Proverbs (also here and here); Barton on Ecclesiastes (1908, also here, and at the Internet Archive here and here); Gray on Isaiah: vol. 1 (1-39, also here); Harper on Amos and Hosea (1905, also at the Internet Archive here and here); Smith on Micah, Zephaniah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Obadiah and Joel (also here and here); Mitchell on Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi and Jonah (also here and here); Montgomery on Daniel; Allen on Matthew (1907, also at the Internet Archive here); Gould on Mark (1896, also at the Internet Archive here); Plummer on Luke (6th ed., 1903, also at the Internet Archive here); Gloag on Acts: vol. 1, vol. 2; Sanday and Headlam on Romans (1895, 7th ed. 1902, ninth ed. 1904, 10th ed. 1905). Also at the Internet Archive here; Robertson on 1 Corinthians; Plummer on 2 Corinthians (1915, also here, and at the Internet Archive here); Burton on Galatians (1920, also at the Internet Archive here); Abbott on Ephesians and Colossians (1897, 1903, also at the Internet Archive here); Vincent on Philippians and Philemon (1897, also at the Internet Archive here); Frame on 1st and 2nd Thessalonians (1912, also at the Internet Archive here); Lock on the Patoral Epistles; Moffatt on Hebrews; Ropes on James (1916, also at the Internet Archive here); Bigg on the Epistles of Peter and Jude (1903, also here, and at the Internet Archive here); Brooke on the Epistles of John; Charles on Revelation, vol. 1 (also at the Internet Archive), vol. 2 (also at the Internet Archive, 1920);

·         The “Speaker's Commentary.” The Holy Bible, According to the Authorized Version (A.D. 1611): With an Explanatory and Critical Commentary and a Revision of the Translation, by Bishops and Other Clergy of the Anglican Church, edited by Frederic C. Cook. Published in London by J. Murray, in eleven volumes 1871-1881, followed by 2 Apocrypha volumes edited by Henry Wace. This series is deliberately conservative. It represents conservative Anglican scholarship at the end of the nineteenth century, in reaction to the liberal higher-critical approach. —vol. 1, part 1 (1871) Genesis and Exodus; vol. 1, part 2 (1871) Leviticus to Deuteronomy; vol. 2 (1872) Joshua to I Kings (also here); vol. 3 (1873) II Kings to Esther; vol. 4 (1873) Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon (also here); vol. 5 (1875) Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations; vol. 6 (1876) Ezekiel, Daniel, and the Minor Prophets; New Testament, vol. 1 (1878) Mathew, Mark, Luke; vol. 2 (1880) John and Acts (also here); vol. 3 (1881) Romans to Philemon; vol. 4 (1881) Hebrews to Revelation; Apocrypha, vol. 1 (1888); Apocrypha, vol. 2 (1888, also here).

·         The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges. Although the authors of this series use critical methods, their interpretations tend to be moderately conservative. — Maclear on Joshua (1897); Lias on Judges (1896); Kirkpatrick on 2nd Samuel (1890); Lumby on 1st Kings (1886); Lumby on 2nd Kings (1891); Barnes on 1st and 2nd Chronicles (1899); Davidson on Job (1884); Kirkpatrick on Psalms (1906) Cf. also the separate volumes Psalms 1-41 (1901), Psalms 42-89 (1900, also here), Psalms 90-150 (1903, also here); Perowne on Proverbs (1899); Plumptre on Ecclesiastes (1888); Harper on the Song of Solomon (1902); Skinner on Isaiah, chaps. 1-39 (1897), chaps. 40-66 (1898); Davidson on Ezekiel (1893); Driver on Daniel (1900); Cheyne on Hosea (1884); Driver on Joel and Amos (1898); Perowne on Obadiah and Jonah (1889); Cheyne on Micah (1882); Davidson on Nahum, Habakkuk and Zephaniah (1896); Perowne on Haggai and Zechariah (1890); Carr on Matthew (1893); Maclear on Mark (1893); Farrar on Luke (1891); Plummer on John (1902); Lumby on Acts (1891); Moule on Romans (1891); Lias on 1st Corinthians (1896); Lias on 2nd Corinthians (1897); Perowne on Galatians (1896); Moule on Ephesians (1891); Moule on Philippians (1893); Moule on Colossians and Philemon (1898); Findlay on 1st and 2nd Thessalonians (1898); Humphreys on 1st and 2nd Timothy and Titus (1895); Farrar on Hebrews (1891); Plumptre on James (1890); Plumptre on 1st and 2nd Peter and Jude (1890); Plummer on the Epistles of John (1889, cf. also the revised edition of 1896); Simcox on the Revelation of John (1894).

·         The ‘Westminster Commentaries’ series, edited by Walter Lock. "The series will be less elementary than the Cambridge Bible for Schools, less critical than the International Critical Commentary, less didactic than the Expositor's Bible; and it is hoped that it may be of use both to theological students and to the clergy, as well as to the growing number of educated laymen and laywomen who wish to read the Bible intelligently and reverently." (Prefatory Note by the General Editor). — Driver on Genesis: 4th edition (1905), 10th edition (1910); NcNeile on Exodus (1908, also here and here); Gibson on Job, 2nd ed. (1905); Wade on Isaiah (1911); Elliott-Binns on Jeremiah (1919); Redpath on Ezekiel (1907); Edghill on Amos (1914); Wade on Micah, Micah, Obadiah, Joel, and Jonah (1925); Ragg on Luke (1922, also here) Robinson on Galatians (1899); Jones on Philippians (1918) E.F. Brown on the Pastoral Epistles (1917); Wickham on Hebrews (1922) Knowling on James (1922).

·         The English edition of Johann Peter Lange's Theologisch-homiletisches Bibelwerk, translated, edited and enlarged by Philip Schaff and others: Theological and Homiletical Introduction to the Old Testament, by J.P. Lange, translated by Tayler Lewis and A. Gosman; Genesis, by J.P. Lange, translated by Tayler Lewis and A. Gosman; Exodus, by J.P. Lange, translated by Charles M. Mead (also here); Leviticus, by Frederic Gardiner (also here); Numbers, by J.P. Lange, translated by Samuel T. Lowrie and A. Gosman; Deuteronomy, by Wilhelm Julius Schröeder, translated by A. Gosman; Joshua, by F.R. Fay, translated by George R. Bliss (also here); Judges, by Paulus Cassel, translated by P.H. Streenstra (also here); Ruth, by Paulus Cassel, translated by P.H. Streenstra (also here); First and Second Samuel, by Chr. Fr. David Erdmann, translated by C.H. Toy and John A. Broadus (also here); First and Second Kings, by Karl Chr. W.F. Bähr, translated by Edwin Harwood and W.G. Sumner (also here); First and Second Chronicles, by Otto Zöckler, translated by James G. Murphy; Ezra, by W. Schulz, translated by Charles A. Briggs; Nehemiah, by Howard Crosby; Esther, by W. Schultz, translated by James Strong; Job, by Otto Zöckler, translated by L.J. Evans (includes also a General Introduction to the Poetical Books by Philip Schaff); Psalms, by Carl Bernhard Moll, translated by Charles A. Briggs, John Forsyth, James B. Hammond, and Fred. McCurdy (also here); Proverbs, by Otto Zöckler, translated by Charles A. Aiken (also here); Ecclesiastes, by Otto Zöckler, translated by William Wells (also here); Song of Solomon, by Otto Zöckler, translated by W. Henry Green (also here); Isaiah, by Carl Wilhelm Eduard Nägelsbach, translated by Samuel T. Lowrie and Dunlop Moore (also here); Jeremiah and Lamentations, by Carl Wilhelm Eduard Nägelsbach, translated by Samuel Ralph Asbury; Ezekiel, by F.W. J. Schröder, translated by Patrick Fairbairn and William Findlay (also here and here); Daniel, by Otto Zöckler, translated by James Strong (also here and here); The Minor Prophets, by Paul Kleinert, Otto Schmoller, George R. Bliss, Talbot W. Chambers, Charles Elliot, John Forsyth, J. Frederick McCurdy, and Joseph Packard (also here); The Apocrypha, by Edwin Cone Bissell; Theological and Homiletical Introduction to the New Testament, by J.P. Lange, translated by Philip Schaff; Matthew, by J.P. Lange, translated by Philip Schaff; Mark, by J.P. Lange; Luke, by J.J. Van Oosterzee, translated by Philip Schaff and Charles C. Starbuck; John, by J.P. Lange, translated by Edward D. Yeomans (also here); Acts of the Apostles, by Gotthard Victor Lechler, translated by Charles F. Schaeffer (also here); Romans, by F.R. Fay, translated by J.F. Hurst; First Corinthians, by Christian Friedrich Kling, translated by Daniel W. Poor (also here); Second Corinthians, by Christian Friedrich Kling, translated by Conway P. Wing (also here); Galatians, by Otto Schmoller, translated by C.C. Starbuck; Ephesians, by Karl Braune, translated by M.B. Riddle; Philippians, by Karl Braune, translated by Horatio B. Hackett; Colossians, by Karl Braune, translated by M.B. Riddle; First and Second Thessalonians, by C.A. Auberlen and C.J. Riggenbach, translated by John Lillie; First and Second Timothy, by J.J. Van Oosterzee, translated by E.A. Washburn and E. Harwood; Titus, by J.J. Van Oosterzee, translated by George E. Day; Philemon, by J.J. Van Oosterzee, translated by Horatio B. Hackett; Hebrews, by Carl Bernhard Moll, translated by A.C. Kendrick; James, by J.J. Van Oosterzee, translated by J. Isidor Mombert; Epistles of Peter, by G.F.C. Fronmüller, translated by J. Isidor Mombert; Epistles of John, by Karl Braune, translated by J. Isidor Mombert; Epistle of Jude, by G.F.C. Fronmüller, translated by J. Isidor Mombert; Revelation of John, by J.P. Lange, translated by Evelina Moore (also here).

·         Also online are the following original German volumes of Lange's Theologisch-homiletisches Bibelwerk: Matthew, by J.P. Lange; Mark, by J.P. Lange; John, by J.P. Lange; Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, by Karl Braune.