Reformed Churchmen

We are Confessional Calvinists and a Prayer Book Church-people. In 2012, we remembered the 350th anniversary of the 1662 Book of Common Prayer; also, we remembered the 450th anniversary of John Jewel's sober, scholarly, and Reformed "An Apology of the Church of England." In 2013, we remembered the publication of the "Heidelberg Catechism" and the influence of Reformed theologians in England, including Heinrich Bullinger's Decades. For 2014: Tyndale's NT translation. For 2015, John Roger, Rowland Taylor and Bishop John Hooper's martyrdom, burned at the stakes. Books of the month. December 2014: Alan Jacob's "Book of Common Prayer" at: http://www.amazon.com/Book-Common-Prayer-Biography-Religious/dp/0691154813/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1417814005&sr=8-1&keywords=jacobs+book+of+common+prayer. January 2015: A.F. Pollard's "Thomas Cranmer and the English Reformation: 1489-1556" at: http://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Cranmer-English-Reformation-1489-1556/dp/1592448658/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1420055574&sr=8-1&keywords=A.F.+Pollard+Cranmer. February 2015: Jaspar Ridley's "Thomas Cranmer" at: http://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Cranmer-Jasper-Ridley/dp/0198212879/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1422892154&sr=8-1&keywords=jasper+ridley+cranmer&pebp=1422892151110&peasin=198212879

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Prof. Gerald Bray's "Exposition of the Thirty-nine Articles:" For Beginners


Bray, Gerald. The Faith We Confess: An Exposition of the Thirty-nine Articles.  London: Latimer Press, 2009.

This handy little 229-page volume is serviceable to get oriented, briefly, to the Thirty-nine Articles.  The volume is available at: http://www.amazon.com/The-Faith-Confess-Exposition-Thirty-Nine/dp/0946307849/ref=pd_sim_b_2

Outline

The Historic Formularies of the Church of England

Articles as Statements of Doctrine

The Revision of the Articles

The Structure of the Articles

  1. The Catholic Doctrines
  2. The Protestant Doctrines
  3. The Anglican Doctrines

Bibliography

The Articles

1.  Of Faith in the Holy Trinity.
2.  Of Christ the Son of God.
3.  Of his going down into Hell.
4.  Of his Resurrection.
5.  Of the Holy Ghost.
6.  Of the Sufficiency of the Scripture.
7.  Of the Old Testament.
8.  Of the Three Creeds.
9.  Of Original or Birth-sin.
10.    Of Free-Will.
11.    Of Justification.
12.    Of Good Works.
13.    Of Works before Justification.
14.    Of Works of Supererogation.
15.    Of Christ alone without Sin.
16.    Of Sin after Baptism.
17.    Of Predestination and Election.
18.    Of obtaining Salvation by Christ.
19.    Of the Church.
20.    Of the Authority of the Church.
21.    Of the Authority of General Councils.
22.    Of Purgatory.
23.    Of Ministering in the Congregation.
24.    Of speaking in the Congregation.
25.    Of the Sacraments.
26.    Of the Unworthiness of Ministers.
27.    Of Baptism.
28.    Of the Lord's Supper.
29.    Of the Wicked which eat not the Body of Christ.
30.    Of both kinds.
31.    Of Christ's one Oblation.
32.    Of the Marriage of Priests.
33.    Of Excommunicate Persons.
34.    Of the Traditions of the Church.
35.    Of the Homilies.
36.    Of Consecrating of Ministers.
37.    Of Civil Magistrates.
38.    Of Christian men's Goods.
39.    Of a Christian man's Oath.

Prof. Bray briefly discusses the historic formularies (BCPs, Articles, Ordinal), the Articles as statements of doctrine, the origin of the Articles, the revision of the Articles, the structure of the Articles—Catholic, Protestant, Anglican, and a brief bibliography.  Then, he proceeds to go through each Article in the briefest of ways.  Thus, this volume is not—not really—a systematic theology per se.  It’s an introduction.  He gives a few brief questions and a few reading suggestions per chapter. But lest Prof. Bray’s brevity be mistaken for shallowness, think of the tip of an iceberg; serious historical scholarship underlies the little volume; on the other hand, it is not a serious volume for systematic theology or for the graduate student.  In fact, it is more on a Sunday School or high school level.  It may barely pass as a first-year collegiate level course—for supplemental reading.  For serious inquiries, one will need other volumes for that.  But, for new joins getting “their sea legs,” this is serviceable.

There have been three formularies that have shaped the doctrine, devotion and discipline of the (Reformational but Continuing) Catholic Church of England—the Thirty-nine Articles, the Book of Common Prayer (BCP), and the Ordinal. The framework and design is Thomas Cranmer’s (1489-1556).  An effort was made in England to revise the BCP, but it was repelled by Parliament; however, in the USA, the Anglo-Catholic wing was more successful in influencing Prayer Book revision, although their effort to toss the Articles was unsuccessful.  Nonetheless, there was early 20th century efforts to toss the Protestant and Reformed nature of the Episcopal Church.

At the present, in England, few young people have any experience with the 1662 BCP.  The Alternative Service Book (1980) and Common Worship (2000) have effaced a once-recognizable service, recognizable worldwide.  The same diluted effect is observable in the US Church with the 1979 BCP; only the old folks would still remember the 1928 BCP.

As for the 1571 Articles of Religion, they have never been officially rescinded in the Church of England.  Rather, a “more drastic fate” has occurred—“they have been sidelined and ignored instead” (2). Few read them.  Few confess them.  Few understand the context.  Yet, Prof. Bray asserts [rather like Utopianism?] that they “indeed are the church’s confession of faith” (3).

The Articles as Statements of Faith

The larger history goes back to ancient Roman law codes. Roman decisions were long and complex.  Ergo, summaries or epitomes of decisions were put together; a summary of the ruling, or resultant “canons,” were developed for legal study. Collections developed, but there was discord and disagreements.  During the 12th century when Popes were seeking to consolidate their geographical, legal, political and theological control, efforts at consolidated rules were developed.  Gratian, a lawyer-monk (c. 1140) and Peter Lombard (1090-1160) developed and consolidated the discordant canons.  The Decretum in 4 volumes is famous.  Papal decretals were collected and organized. Illustrious names of “Great Necromaners” emerge: Gregory X (1234), Boniface VIII (1298), Clement V (1313), and John XXII (1325).  The Corpus iuris canonici resulted.

Scholasticism, as a theological method, the proposal of propositions, sometimes provocatively put, with proposed answers, was the academic model to which Luther, Calvin and Cranmer were exposed. Brief statements were crafted as epitomes for memory-work.  The “epitomes” or “articles” were the tips of an iceberg.

Prof. Bray indicates this is how the Articles should be viewed—tips of an iceberg.  Further, he advises against avoidance against presumptiveness, to wit, like the Captain of the Titanic.  The Articles have depths underlying them. 

He then offers a quick history:

  • 95 theses by Luther for debate and discussion
  • 1530 Augsburg Confession of “confessors” or “Protestants”
  • The Ten Articles of 1536, unlike the Augsburg Confession
  • Henry VIII’s commentary on the 10 Articles, entitled “The Bishops’ Book,” probably crafted by Cranmer
  • The Six Articles, dubbed as “ultra-conservative” by Prof. Bray, but dubbed “Anglo-Italian” articles by others
  • Henry VIII dies in 1547, Edward VI becomes the King and Cranmer is “in charge of church affairs”
  • Cranmer first act is the publication of Homilies (some authored by Anglo-Italians like Ed Bonner and John Harpsfield, men who would resurface in Mary’s time as persecutors of Christ and the Continuing and Reformed Church of England)
  • The second act was the 1549 BCP
  • Then, with the counsel of Reformed Churchmen, the 1552 BCP was revised and passed Parliament for use on 1 Nov 1552.  It would be rescinded by the Anglo-Spanish Queen Mary.
  • The 42 Articles were allegedly passed in the Ecclesiastical Convocation.  Matthew Parker insists that the Articles were passed, but the modern TFOs deny Parker’s eye-witness report.
  • The Articles “were hostile to Rome” and Cranmer, like other Englishmen, Frenchmen, Spaniards, and Germans, were hostile to Papal pretensions; the Articles were theologically hostile to Tridentine developments.  Prof. Bray insists that the Articles cannot be understood apart from the developments of the Council of Trent—a major impetus to Confessionally Reformed developments in Scotland, Switzerland, Germany, Holland and France, each having distinctive, but Reformed responses.
  • “Via media” refers to varied Reformed parties and emphases.  The TFOs have often made it Rome v. Protestantism.  It was nothing of the kind, notwithstanding the claims of the TFOs in captivity to their agendas and with their efforts to efface history.

Revision of the Articles

  • Edward VI died on 6 Jul 1553 and the Anglo-Spanish Queen Mary takes the throne.  Prof. Bray calls it a “disaster for the Protestant cause,” a term “Protestant” being rather anti-TFO in tone.
  • By 20 Dec 1553, the 1552 BCP is “officially” out of use.  The 42 Articles died a stillborn’s death.
  • After Mary’s departure to the next world, where she awaits the Final Judgment (it’s as if it happened yesterday in God’s mind), and after Elizabeth’s accession, Matthew Parker and John Jewel revised the Articles.  They passed in Convocation on 29 Jan 1563.  They were signed 5 Feb 1563.
  • Elizabeth strikes Article 29, perhaps as a concession to Lutherans and perhaps because she was not very sophisticated on the question
  • The Pope excommunicated Elizabeth in 1570; she allows the Articles to be further reviewed; Article 29 is put back into the Articles.  The 39 Articles pass in Canterbury’s Convocation on 4 May 1571
  • Subscription was formalized in canon 36 in 1604; this was enforced until the late 19th century; it has been gradually weakened since then until an ordinand merely needs a “general assent to the historical traditions of Anglicanism” (11).  Call it what it is: muddling, mishmash, and a sophisticated form of denial, if not ecclesiastical deceit.  At least be honest about it.
  • No one thought the Articles were immutable; Canterbury Whitgift garnered episcopal signatures on 20 Nov 1595 for the Lambeth Articles; Elizabeth strangled those Lambeth Articles in the crib.
  • The next instance of revision was the 1615 Irish Articles, a serious improvement over the 39 Articles.  There were 104 Articles.  These had authority in the Protestant and Reformed Church of Ireland well into and past the beginnings of the English Civil War.
  • The next instance of revision was the Westminster Confession of Faith.  The 39 Articles was “a starting point” and were commended by the Westminster divines; Parliament called the Assembly in 1643 and finished its work in 1646.
  • The Church of England stepped into la-la-land in 1660 by rescinding the Westminster Confession of Faith.
  • Wesley reduced the 39 Articles
  • The 1789 BCP revised the political parts of the BCP, dispatched the Athanasian Creed, and relegated the Articles to its Constitution.  The Articles experienced gentle reforms by 1801.

Yet, in Prof. Bray’s world, the 1571 Articles “remain the standard.” To whom? For whom? Where?  TEC? The Continuers?  They may have some force in the Southern hemisphere, but not in the West.

Prof. Bray gives this breakdown:

  1. Catholic Doctrines—Trinity (1-5), Scripture (6-7, giving Jerome’s view of the canon, not Trent’s), and Creeds (8)
  2. Protestant Doctrines—need of salvation (9-10), justification of men without free will by faith alone by Christ’s merits alone with good works (11-14), Christian living (15-18), the Church (19-22), ministry (23-24), the sacraments (25-31, and church discipline (32-34)
  3. Anglican doctrines—Homilies, 3-fold view of offices and ministry (35-37) and church-state relations (38-39)

Prof. Bray offers a nice and serviceable bibliography for beginning students.

No comments: